Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cacamo v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 764 So. 2d 41.

50 citing documents.

Donsynia Riley Versus Acadian Companies La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
Scott Vicknair, LLC v. Wayne Robinson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Tanya Hurel v. National Fire & Marine Insurance Company D/B/A National Indemnity Group Insurance Companies and Their Insured, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Jennifer Arcuri Versus Walter Stevens, Jr., Eliana Defrancesch, in Her Capacity as Clerk of Court for St. John … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Qwandarious Rowe La. 2022
Law Offices of Robert C. Lehman, A Professional Law Corporation, Law Offices of Robert C. Lehman, LLC and … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Rose Gant v. CNA Insurance Company, Philip A. Spence, LLC, and Phillip A. Spence La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Lisa Jarreau v. Thomas E. Gibbs d/b/a The Law Office of Thomas Gibbs and Robert T. Talley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Barbara E. Davidson v. Charles Eugene Sanders, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
6/30/00), ( (La App. 2nd Cir. 1958)).
Davidson v. Sanders 261 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/30/00), , 45 (citing Jefferson v. Tennant , (La App. 2nd Cir. 1958) ).
Balthazar v. Hensley R. Lee Contracting, Inc. 214 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
The Cottonport Bank v. Lsj, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Cottonport Bank v. LSJ, L.L.C. 212 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Blow v. OneBeacon America Insurance Co. 193 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Co., 99-3479, p. 3 (La.6/30/00), .
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., 99-3479, 99-3480, 99-3481, p. 3 (La.6/30/00), .
Danny Kelly v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company 169 So. 3d 328 La. 2015
6/30/00), (“Courts are not free to rewrite laws to effect a purpose that is not otherwise expressed.”).
Transpetco I Joint Venture v. Clearview Investments, Ltd. 139 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Co., 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), .
Soileau v. Smith True Value & Rental 144 So. 3d 771 La. 2013
Green v. Auto Club Group Insurance Company, 2008-2868 (La.10/28/09), , 184 |,(citing Hood v. Cotter, 2008-0215 (La.12/2/08), ; Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), ; and Descant v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 93-3098 (La.7/5/94), ).
Chumley v. White 80 So. 3d 39 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Co., 1999-3479 (La.6/30/00), , and Jordan v. Central Louisiana Elec.
Oxy USA Inc. v. Quintana Production Co. 79 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Green v. Auto Club Group Insurance Company, 2008-2868, p. 3 (La.10/28/09), ; Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 1999-3479, 1999-3480, 1999-3481, pp. *378 2-3 (La.6/30/00), ; Descant v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 1993-3098, p. 3 (La.7/5/94), .
Holland v. Lincoln General Hospital 48 So. 3d 1050 La. 2010
Co., 1999-3479 (La.6/30/00), .
Trascher v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. 43 So. 3d 961 La. 2010
Co.], supra[, ] at 46 [La.2000] and Boatwright v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Green v. Auto Club Group Insurance Co. 24 So. 3d 182 La. 2009
Co., 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), ; Descant v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, 93-3098 (La.7/5/94), .
Tietjen v. City of Shreveport 17 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Co., 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), ; White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-393 (La.9/9/97), .
Hood v. Cotter 5 So. 3d 819 La. 2008
Fire Ins., 99-3479, pp. 2-3 (La.6/30/00), ; Descant v. Adm’ of Tulane Educ.
Arc Industries, L.L.C. v. William H. Nungesser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Arc Industries, LLC v. Nungesser 970 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., 99-3479, p. 6 (La.6/30/00), .).
French Jordan, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co. 958 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Co., 99-3479 (La.06/30/00), .
Elliott v. Amato and Creely 934 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Co., 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), .
Hamilton v. Royal Intern. Petroleum Corp. 934 So. 2d 25 La. 2006
Co., 99-3479, p. 4 (La.6/30/00), ; White v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 97-393, p. 4 (La.9/9/97), .
Sorrento Companies v. Honeywell Intern. 916 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 99-3479, 99-3480, 99-3481, p. 5 (La.6/30/00), .
Louviere v. State 923 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Co., 99-3479, pp. 4-5 (La.6/30/00), .
Willis-Knighton Medical v. Sales Tax Com'n 903 So. 2d 1071 La. 2005
art. 9; Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 99-3479, 99-3480, 99-3481, p. 7 (La.6/30/00), .
Price v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. 915 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
art. 42(2) & (4); see Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 99-3479, p. 4 (La.6/30/00), .
MICHAEL F. SMITH, CPA v. Alford 906 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 99-3479, p. 5 (La.6/30/00), .
HR 10 Profit Sharing Plan v. Mayeux 893 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Co., 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), , which dealt with interpretation of the venue provision for class actions provided by La.
Saldana v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 889 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Co., 99-3479 (La.06/30/00), .
State v. Johnson 884 So. 2d 568 La. 2004
While we recognize that as a general proposition, comments made during one committee meeting are not evidence of the intent of the legislature as a whole, Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 99-3479, 99-3480, 99-3481, p. 9 (La.6/30/00), , as respects those parts of a bill passed as introduced by a standing committee without change, it is reasonable to assume that the legislature adopted the intent of the committee.
Willis-Knighton Med. Ctr. v. Caddo-Shreveport Sales 862 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Co., 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), ; Southwest Gaming Servs.
Bertucci v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 851 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Co., XXXX-XXXX, p. 4-5(La.6/30/00), , the Supreme Court explained that the general venue rules of La.Code Civ.Proc.
Thomas v. Mobil Oil Corp. 843 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Co., 99-3479, 99-3480, 99-3481, ("The appropriate venue for [class action] claims is set forth in [Civil Procedure Article] 593...").
Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana v. State Farm 839 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Co., XXXX-XXXX (La.06/30/00), , 43: The Direct Action Statute is designed to grant a procedural right of action against an insurer where the plaintiff has a substantive cause of action against the insured.
Scarbrough v. J. Ray McDermott 833 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
Co., 99-3479, p. 6 (La.6/30/00), .
CLECO EVANGELINE, INC. v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 808 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., 99-3479, p. 4 (La.6/30/00), .
Cacamo v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 798 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), .
Taube v. St. Charles Parish School Board 787 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Co., 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), , the Court stated: We have consistently held that the starting point in interpreting any statute is the language of the statute itself.
Deshautelle v. US Agencies Casualty Insurance Co. 808 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
4th Cir.11/10/99), , reversed, 99-3479 (La.6/30/00), , which held that the general venue provisions of LSA Code of Civil Procedure art. 42 control determinations of proper venue in this type of action.
LaBorde v. AMERICAN NAT. PROPERTY & CAS. 780 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
However, in Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 99-3479, 99-3480, 99-3481 (La.6/30/00), , the supreme court concluded that the language in the Direct Action Statute, "Art. 42 only", does not limit the venue choices otherwise available to a plaintiff.
Nitro Gaming, Inc. v. DI Foods, Inc. 779 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co., 99-3479, 3480, 3481 (La.06/30/00), ; Jordan v. Central Louisiana Elec.
Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 767 So. 2d 700 La. 2000
We reversed the judgment of the court of appeal as to venue in Cacamo v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 99-3479, 99-3480, 99-3481 (La.6/30/00), .