Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Frank, 803 So. 2d 1.

65 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Marvin Watson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State v. Clark, 02–1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), State v. Frank, 99– 0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01)
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
1/17/01), (same); State v. Broadway, 96-2659 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Chaddrick Piper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 265 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Trung Le 243 So. 3d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/17/01), , 8 , as revised (4/16/01).
State v. Handy 226 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Jones 220 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Clark, 2002-1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), (“Thus, a defendant is not entitled to a jury entirely ignorant of his case and cannot prevail on a motion for change of venue merely, by showing a general level of public awareness about the crime.”); State v. Frank, 1999-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Thompson 163 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Magee, 11-0574 (La.9/28/12), , citing State v. Clark, 02-1463 (La.6/27/03), , and State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), , as revised (Apr.
State of Louisiana v. Mark Wayne Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1/17/01), -20, the supreme court established three approaches to reviewing incomplete record claims: Article I, § 19 of the Louisiana Constitution guarantees defendants a right of appeal “based upon a complete record of all the evidence upon which the judgment is based.” Material omissions fr
State v. Thibodeaux 162 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In State v. Frank, 99-553, pp. 20-21 (La.1/17/01), -20 , the supreme court established three approaches to reviewing incomplete record claims: Article I, § 19 of the Louisiana Constitution guarantees defendants a right of appeal “based upon a complete record of all the evidence upon which the judgment is based.” Material omissions from the transcript of the proceed
State v. Cope 137 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
1433 , 158 L.Ed.2d 98 (2004); State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Brian Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Segura 127 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), ; State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Buckley 120 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Lee, supra, p. 33 , 976 So.2d at 133 ; State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/17/01), ] in which the court held that if a juror who has acquired knowledge about the case through the media can sufficiently lay aside his or her impression of the defendant's guilt or innocence and render a verdict based on the evidence presented, he or she is competent to serve as a juror.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
State v. Clark, 02-1463, p. 18 (La.6/27/03), ; State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Molere 99 So. 3d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Article I, § 19 of the Louisiana Constitution guarantees defendants a right of appeal “based upon a complete record of all the evidence upon which the judgment is based.” See also State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Burton 71 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Frank, 99-553, p. 20 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Bright, 03-489, p. 8 (La.App.
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
Lee, 976 So.2d at 133 ; State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Wright 57 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
143 , 172 L.Ed.2d 39 (2008); State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.01/17/01), .
State v. White 57 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Instead, “the defendant must show the extent of prejudice in the minds of the community as a result of such knowledge or exposure to the case before trial.” State v. Clark, supra, at 1057 , citing State v. Frank, 1999-0553 (La.01/17/01), .
State v. Massey 51 So. 3d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 21 (La.1/14/01), -20 , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-part standard for reviewing incomplete record claims.
State of Louisiana v. Vincent Marinello La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Marinello 49 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
He cites State v. Frank, 99-553 (La.1/17/01), .
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 11 (La.1/17/01), (citations omitted).
State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 11 (La.1/17/01), (citations omitted).
State v. Mazique 40 So. 3d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1/17/01), ; State v. Mitchell, 08-136 (La.App.
State v. Williams 22 So. 3d 867 La. 2009
See State v. LaCaze, 99-0584 (1/25/02), (brother and sister shot along with off-duty police officer working security detail at family-owned restaurant); State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), (same).
State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
[T]he defendant must prove more than mere public knowledge or familiarity with the facts of the case to be entitled to have his trial moved to another parish; rather, the defendant must show the extent of prejudice in the minds of the community as a result of such knowledge or exposure to the case before trial.” State v. Frank, 99-0553,39 p. 14 (La.1/17/01), -15 .
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 7/27/05), , 849: In State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 21 (La.1/14/01), -20 , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-part standard for reviewing incomplete record claims.
State v. Breaux 11 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. C.J. 9 So. 3d 845 La. 2009
Although a trial court “may reassess a determination of indigency at any time,” State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 5 *846 (La.1/17/01), , see La.R.S.
State v. Warren 2 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Frank, 1999-0553 (La.1/17/01)
State v. Logan 986 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 14 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), (no "bright line test for determining the degree of prejudice existing in the collective mind of the community .
State v. Montz 968 So. 2d 727 La. 2007
State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 16 (La.1/17/01), (no "bright line test for determining the degree of prejudice existing in the collective mind of the community *728 .
State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Lee 964 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In State v. Frank, 99-0553, pp. 16-17 (La.1/17/01), -17 , 110 out of 113 venire members (97%) had been exposed to some publicity surrounding the case, and 89% of the prospective jurors indicated they had been exposed to information about the case on more than one occasion or from multiple sources.
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
Manning , XXXX-XXXX p. 6, 885 So.2d at 1061 ; State v. Frank, XXXX-XXXX p. 11 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Connolly, XXXX-XXXX p. 4-5 (La.7/1/97), .
State v. Wright 931 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
In State v. Frank, XXXX-XXXX (La.01/17/01), , the supreme court explained that, "there is not a bright line test for determining the degree of prejudice existing in the collective mind of the community.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Davis, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Davis 929 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Frank, 99-553 (La.1/17/01), ; La.
State v. Roberson 929 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Frank, XXXX-XXXX (La.01/17/01), .
State v. Ambeau 930 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 6/26/02), -92 , citing State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), .
State v. Hopkins 908 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), ; State v. Allen, 95-1754 (La.9/5/96), .
State v. Scott 913 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
In State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 21 (La.1/14/01), -20 , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-part standard for reviewing incomplete record claims.
State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
[48] State v. Frank, 99-0553 (La.1/17/01), .