Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sykes, 857 So. 2d 638.
-
State v. Ross
195 So. 3d 1210
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/8/03), ; State v. Hernandez, 14-863, p. 19 (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Asa Bentley AKA - Asa N. Bentley
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/8/03), writ denied, 03- 3429 (La.
-
State v. Bentley
182 So. 3d 1269
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 10/8/08), , writ denied, 03-3429 (La.4/2/04), .
- State v. Hernandez 177 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
-
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/8/03), -42, writ denied, 03-3429 (La.
-
State v. Boyer
56 So. 3d 1119
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 10/8/03), -42 , writ denied, 03-3429 (La.4/2/04), , this court noted: The supreme court has stated the following regarding the distinction of claims raised in a motion for new trial and a motion for post-verdict judgment of acquittal: However, a motion for new trial presents only the issue of the weight of the
-
State of Louisiana v. Paul Roberts, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 10/8/03), writ denied, 03-3429 (La.
-
State v. Roberts
947 So. 2d 208
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 10/8/03) , , writ denied, 03-3429 (La.4/2/04), (alteration in original).
-
State of Louisiana v. Vernon Leon Cox
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 10/8/03), writ denied, 03-3429 (La.
-
State v. Cox
876 So. 2d 932
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 10/8/03) , , writ denied, 03-3429 (La.4/2/04), .
- State of Louisiana v. Cedric Daniels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Daniels 873 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State of Louisiana v. Gary Dewayne Hamilton
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 10/8/03), - 42, this court has stated the following regarding review of a motion for new trial: The supreme court has stated the following regarding the distinction of claims raised in a motion for new trial and a motion for post-verdict judgment of acquittal: However, a motion for ne
-
State v. Hamilton
867 So. 2d 151
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
3 Cir. 10/8/03), , 641 - 42, this court has stated the following regarding review of a motion for new trial: The supreme court has stated the following regarding the distinction of claims raised in a motion for new trial and a motion for post-verdict judgment of acquittal: However, a motion for new trial presents only the issue of the