Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.

544 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jacob Dewayne Purvis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Purvis 217 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Willie Lee Price, Jr. -Aka- Willie Price La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kenton Dawne Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Price 216 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tedrick Jewan Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Francisco Jesus Vasquez-Ramirez La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Richardson 210 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Vasquez-Ramirez 210 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Henry Lawrence Leger AKA Henry Leger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Earl Lewis, IV La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brandy Mize La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Steven Blunt AKA Steven L. Blunt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
ense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, this court has suggested that several factors may be considered: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Blunt 201 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
er a sentence shocks the sense of justice or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, this court has suggested that several factors may be considered: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Soamer Notier Rivera Soriano AKA Soamer N. Rivera-Soriano AKA Soamer R. Soriano La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Soriano 192 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Rosalyn Faith Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: 13 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Stephon Enrique Fallon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 2/12/03), ( (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Larry Joseph McKithern AKA - Larry McKithern AKA - Larry J. McKithern La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Urena 215 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Fahim A. Shaikh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Shaikh 188 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well’settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Lamantraes Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Williams 186 So. 3d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day AKA - Jamie Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
So.2d 786, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Day 182 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Ingram La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Ingram 181 So. 3d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ryan Crenna Garcia AKA - Ryan C. Garcia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
So.2d 786, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Heller Marie Dupuis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Edward Jackson -Aka- Charles E. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ceasar James Williams -Aka- Ceaser James Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State v. Williams 181 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Barry G. Roy AKA - Barry Roy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Roy 177 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Toby James Fruge 179 So. 3d 579 La. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Terrance Mouton AKA Terrence Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Glenn Von Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, ―it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.‖ (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Dionte Eugene Daugherty La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Mouton 175 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Daugherty 175 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v. Batiste, *1168 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Cedric Daniels La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
So.2d 786, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Daniels 215 So. 3d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Lee Cox La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
So.2d 786, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Alfred Mayo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State v. Mayo 165 So. 3d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.