Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.

544 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sammy Cheatham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2026
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jack Ray, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State 11 v. Batiste, (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Chrystal Clues-Alexander La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Antonio Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Deondre Scarborough La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
786, 789, writ denied, 03–562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Courtland E. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Danny Trey Crossland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tyrek Randall La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua J. Boutte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Allen Hayes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Markus O. Andrews La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Blaine Keith Lecompte La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Marcel N. Dugar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Cooper, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
[Another] panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Fred B. Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Byron Julies Lejeune La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Dwight Thomas AKA Dwayne Jerome Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana Versus Michael Anthony Short La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Harrison Buckner Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Scott Robert Swank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana Versus Alvin Joseph Adams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Martin Michot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Fillmore Wright La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Detron Devon Lambert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Charles Lee Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Stacy Lynn Tharpe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Dakota Wayne Singletary La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Markell James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Eric Wayne Lemay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
1061, a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. David K. Hawkes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be 10 individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joby Deforrest Duck La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Harville, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Edward Garriet, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Ashton Dean Biggs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Douglas Paul James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Raymond Celestine, IV La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. George McKinney, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. O'Shay Devan Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Austin William Bost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jacob Cobb La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State 5 v. Batiste, (LaApp.
State of Louisiana v. Rj Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Earl James Darby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
1061, a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Alphonso Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Victor D. Guillory A/K/A Victory Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Tyler John Clause La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kyle Dewayne Forrester La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (LaApp.