Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 594 So. 2d 1.
- State v. Hood 943 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Dustin K. Runyon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Carl W. Brister
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Robert Andrews
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” [, 3] (La.App.
- State v. Sigue 940 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Clark 940 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Warren Todd Dossman
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Russell W. Cole
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may 3 provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Brian Clark
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Melvin Sigue
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Dossman 940 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. SDG 931 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. S.D.G.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Al Jerome Jeansonne, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Jeansonne 931 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. S.D.G.
931 So. 2d 1244
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State v. Bordelon
929 So. 2d 244
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may |1fiprovide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Thibodeaux 924 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Karl Thibodeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Slaydon 921 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Jason L. Slaydon
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Thibodeaux 918 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
State of Louisiana v. Patrick D. Thibodeaux
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Paul E. Day
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Day 915 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Wardsworth
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Wardsworth 904 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Vallery 899 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State of Louisiana v. John Alden Vallery, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- State v. Collins 896 So. 2d 1265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Dwayne Collins
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Theriot 893 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Theriot
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
-
State of Louisiana v. Damien D. Trahan
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State of Louisiana v. William L. Giles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Giles 884 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State of Louisiana v. Dustin Mathew Burnaman
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Burnaman 872 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. White 872 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
State of Louisiana v. Charles Edward White
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes 6 may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be 7 individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense 8 committed.” (La.App.
- State v. Smith 846 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- State v. Wade 693 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- State v. Williams 688 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997