DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bienemy, 483 So. 2d 1105.

152 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Allen Clayton Fulks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Donald Alan Crooks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy,” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Austin William Bost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marvin Santiago La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy O'Neal Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kelby Meaux A/K/A Kelby D. Meaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Edwin Albert Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Miller 269 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    State v. Bienemy , (La.App.
  • State v. Galle 267 So. 3d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 4 Cir. 6/16/99), , 147, quoting State v. Bienemy , , 1107 (La.
  • State v. Williams 240 So. 3d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Bordes , [19]98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , quoting State v. Bienemy , , 1107 (La.
  • State v. Ceasar 224 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” *1230 (La.
  • State ex rel. Sterling v. State 207 So. 3d 1048 La. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Mary Henderson Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    disfavored practice: An alleged error can be construed as trial strategy if there are differing views regarding the advisability of a tactic: This court has long agreed with our brethren of the fourth circuit in recognizing “that if an alleged error falls ‘within the ambit of trial strategy’ it doesn’t ‘establish ineffective assistance of counsel.’ (La.App.
  • State v. Falgout 198 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    If trial counsel’s actions fall “within the ambit of trial strategy,” they do not establish “ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Debbie E. Adams AKA Debbie Adams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. Adam Batiste, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    An alleged error can be construed as trial strategy if there are differing views regarding the advisability of a tactic: This court has long agreed with our brethern of the fourth circuit in recognizing “that if an alleged error falls ‘within the ambit of trial strategy’ it doesn’t ‘establish ineffective assistance of counsel.’ (La.App.
  • State v. Amos 192 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 6/16/99) ( (La.App.
  • State v. Merwin 186 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Rumley 183 So. 3d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    This Court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes , 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 ( (La.App.
  • State v. Barbain 179 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    This court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not'“establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes , 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 176 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    This court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes , 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State v. Alverez 158 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy,” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • Jones v. Cain 151 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    This court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy,” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State ex rel. A.J. 151 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Crowell , 99-2238, at p. 8, 773 So.2d at 878 ( (La.App.
  • State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 10/2/13), , (La.App.
  • State v. Quezada 141 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    This court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes , 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State v. Barnes 126 So. 3d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    If trial counsel’s actions fall “within the ambit of trial strategy,” they do not establish “ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Edgar 140 So. 3d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Crowell , 99-2238, at p. 8, 773 So.2d at 878 ( (La.App.
  • State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Crowell , 99-2238, at p. 8, 773 So.2d at 878 ( (La.App.
  • State v. Marzett 123 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/16/99), ( (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 122 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    *1086 This court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes , 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric John Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    9 This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Anderson 116 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    |10This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony St. Romain La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy, it does not establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. St. Romain 157 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy, it does not establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Parker 112 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy,” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Curtis 112 So. 3d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    However, if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    | asThis court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes , 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State v. Skipper 101 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    If an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy,” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Devonta Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    This court has previously recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” Bordes , 98-0086, p. 8, 738 So.2d at 147 , (La.App.
  • State in the Interest of Jv & Hv La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State in the Interest of Jv & Hv La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Dean Craig La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    This Court has recognized that if an alleged error falls “within the ambit of trial strategy” it does not “establish ineffective assistance of counsel.” (La.App.
  • State v. TRUEHILL 38 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    An alleged error can be construed as trial strategy if there are differing views regarding the advisability of a tactic: This court has long agreed with our brethern of the fourth circuit in recognizing “that if an alleged error falls ‘within the ambit of trial strategy’ it doesn’t ‘establish ineffective assistance of counsel.’ (La.App.
  • State v. Vallier 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010