Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. D.H.L., 981 So. 2d 906.

21 citing documents.

State in the Interest of E. A. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), this court discussed the State’s burden of proof in termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter standard of proof than the p
State of Louisiana in the Interest of Z.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State in the Interest of L. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), this court discussed the State’s burden of proof in termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter standard of proof than the prepondera
State in the Interest of M.S. M.B. P.O. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
In re State Z.S.J. 275 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 4/30/08), , 910 (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State's burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter standard of proof than the p
State in the Interest of Z. S. J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State’s burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter standar
State in the Interest of K. D. M.,k. J. M. & K. K. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State’s burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter standar
In re State in Interest of K.D.M. 271 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
3 Cir. 4/30/08), , 910 (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State's burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter standard of proof than the p
State ex rel. M.J.F. 261 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State in the Interest of M.J.F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State in the Interest of K. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana in the Interest of T. D. N. and G. N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana in the Interest of P. M. and T. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State’s burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter standard of p
State of Louisiana in the Interest of S. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State in the Interest of K.D.P., J.L.C., & J.S.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State in the Interest of T.M.B. & T.T.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State ex rel. T.M.B. 221 So. 3d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana in the Interest of H. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State’s burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter
State in the Interest of R.J. and M.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State’s burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter
State in the Interest of J.M.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 4/30/08), (footnotes omitted), we discussed the State’s burden of proof and our standard of review in connection with termination of parental rights proceedings as follows: Our supreme court has recognized that the gravity of terminating parental rights requires our courts to impose a stricter s
State in Interest of Cac 85 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012