Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. J.K.G., 118 So. 3d 10.

33 citing documents.

State in the Interest of E. A. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State in the Interest of L. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State in the Interest of J.T.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State in the Interest of K. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 1/11/12), (quoting State In the Interest of M.H.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of T. D. N. and G. N. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 1/11/12), (quoting State In the Interest of M.H.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of S. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
3 Cir. 1/11/12), (quoting State In the Interest of M.H.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.T., A.T., C.F., A.B., L.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State in the Interest of K.D.P., J.L.C., & J.S.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1/11/12), (2012) (quoting State ex rel.
State in the Interest of T.M.B. & T.T.B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State ex rel. T.M.B. 221 So. 3d 996 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State in the Interest of I.h, M.H., I.H., M.H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State in the Interest M.H., I.T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State ex rel. I.H. 221 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State in the Interest of J. S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State in the Interest of G. M. A. & K. K. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State ex rel. G.M.A. 201 So. 3d 1014 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State in the Interest of M. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 1/11/12), “A trial court’s findings on whether or not parental rights should be terminated are subject to the manifest error standard of review.” In a case involving the involuntary termination of parental rights, there are two separate private interests involved: those of the parents and those of the child.
State ex rel. M.C. 194 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 1/11/12), , “A trial court’s findings on whether or not parental rights should be terminated are subject to the manifest error standard of review,” In a case involving the involuntary termination of parental rights, there are two separate private' interests involved: those of the parents and those of the child.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of I. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 1/11/12), which stated, “A trial court’s findings on whether or not parental rights should be terminated are subject to the manifest error standard of review.” In State in the Interest of O.L.R., 13-616, p. 3 (La.App.
State in the Interest of C. F., A. F., & A. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 1/11/12), “A trial court’s findings on whether or not parental rights should be terminated are subject to the manifest error standard of review.” In State in the Interest of O.L.R., 13-616, p. 3 (La.App.
State of Louisiana in the Interest of A. R. and A. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. A.R. 178 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State in the Interest of C. E., K. E., & C.E. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. C.E. 176 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State of Louisiana in the Interest of H.R., B.R., B.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 1/11/12), “A trial court’s findings on whether or not parental rights should be terminated are subject to the manifest error standard of review.” The trial court ruled in favor of the State, finding clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of L.R.’s parental rights under the provisions of both La
State ex rel. H.R. 165 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 1/11/12), , “A trial court’s findings on whether or not parental rights should be terminated are subject to the manifest error standard of review.” The trial court ruled in favor of the State, finding clear and convincing evidence to support the termination of L.R.’s parental rights under the provisions of both La.Ch.Code a
State of Louisiana in the Interest of R v. N v. R.L., N.V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State ex rel. R.V. 165 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State ex rel. K.V. 161 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State in the Interest of K. v. & K. V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State in the Interest of A. G. B. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 1/11/12), (citing State ex rel.
State ex rel. A.G.B. 153 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 1/11/12), (citing State ex rel.
State in the Interest of S. v. & C. V. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by