Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. Frazier v. State, 868 So. 2d 9.

63 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Dixon, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
2/13/04), ) (citation omitted).
In the Matter of Two (2) Canines Seized from Susan Graham, Rayville, Louisiana La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
2/13/04), State v. Muschkat, 96-2922 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Master La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.H. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Gentry Elvridge Vinson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Harrison La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Anthony L. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Eric Brown Versus State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
2/6/04), (per curiam); State ex rel.
State of Louisiana v. Manuel Dukes La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
2/13/04), (citing 1942 La.
State of Louisiana v. Teddy Aguillard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2/13/04), ] at 15 (citing 1942 La.
State v. Aguillard 242 So. 3d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/13/04), ] at 15 (citing 1942 La.
State of Louisiana v. Clevance Cormier, Jr La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
2/13/04), ] the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed this definition of “lewd and lascivious” for purposes of LSA–R.S.
State v. Thornton 242 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Ernest Carter, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2/6/04), (alteration in original), held: Though “[r]esentencing alone does not restart” the prescriptive period for filing for post-conviction relief once a conviction and sentence have both become final, State ex rel.
State v. Shokr 212 So. 3d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Breedlove 213 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Fahim A. Shaikh La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Shaikh 188 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Lewd and lascivious has been defined as “ ‘an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.’ ” State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 7 (La.2/13/04), ().
State v. Sanderson 174 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
scivious,” the Louisiana Supreme Court has determined that the statute “provides fair notice that the defendant is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.” State v. Interiano, 2003-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State of Louisiana v. John Boyd Baham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2/13/04), -17, the supreme 9 court held that the potential sentence of seven years for indecent behavior with a juvenile was not grossly disproportionate to Interiano’s conduct of masturbating in physical proximity of a child.6 The supreme court stated, “[g]iven the compelling
State v. Wise 182 So. 3d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 4 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Lestrick 128 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Domangue 119 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Lewd and lascivious acts include not only the physical touching of the victim in an indecent manner, but also “indecent sexual displays in the presence of children under the age of seventeen.” State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Davis 108 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Interiano, 2003-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State ex rel. Alo v. State 98 So. 3d 866 La. 2012
Frazier v. State, 03-0242 (La.2/6/04), , his application filed November 24, 2010 arrived timely.
State v. Lirette 102 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In State v. Interiano, 03-1760, pp. 7-8 (La.2/13/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reaffirmed this definition of “lewd and lascivious” for purposes of LSA-R.S.
State of Louisiana v. Avis Renea Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Tracy Wayne Bowie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Bowie 101 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
ivious.” However, the supreme court has determined that the statute “provides fair notice that the defendant ‘is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which |9is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.’ ” State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), ().
State v. Trahan 101 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“lascivious,” the supreme court has determined that the statute “provides fair notice that the defendant ‘is charged with having done an act upon the person of a juvenile which is lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.’ ” State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 7 (La.2/13/04), ().
State v. Rochon 75 So. 3d 876 La. 2011
State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 4 (La.2/13/04); ().
State v. Jones 74 So. 3d 197 La. 2011
14:81(A) as an act which is "lustful, obscene, indecent, tending to deprave the morals in respect to sexual relations, and relating to sexual impurity or incontinence carried on in a wanton manner.” State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), ; (La.
Distinguished State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Interiano, 2003-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Whitmore 58 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
4 See State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.02/13/04), ; State v. Prejean, 216 La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Bott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. R.B. 54 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Thus, “a person knowingly engaged in any overt sexual activity performed in the physical proximity of a child enters a zone of danger in which he runs the risk that a trier of fact may later find that activity criminal in nature.” State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 8 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. RB 54 So. 3d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 8 (La.2/13/04), .
State Ex Rel. Prr, Jr. 36 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Interiano, 2003-1760 (La.2/14/04), (emphasis in original).
In the Interest of P.R.R. 36 So. 3d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
14:81 A. A “lewd and lascivious” act means that the person knowingly engaged in “any overt sexual activity performed in the physical proximity of a child.” State v. Interiano, 2003-1760 (La.2/14/04), (emphasis in original).
State v. Schaller 15 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also, State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04)
State v. Brown 5 So. 3d 107 La. 2009
Frazier v. State, 03-0242 (La.2/6/04), , his amended application and other pleadings filed in open court November 9, 2006, arrived timely.
State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/13/04), as follows: [I]n the absence of a physical touching upon the person of the child, La.R.S.
State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The supreme court discussed the term "in the presence of" in State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 9 (La.2/13/04), , as follows: [I]n the absence of a physical touching upon the person of the child, La.R.S.
State v. Caston 996 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Jones 983 So. 2d 95 La. 2008
State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), ; State v. Williams, 00-1725 (La.11/28/01), ; State v. Carr, 99-2209 (La.5/26/00), .
State v. Borden 986 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
See also, State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Littleton 982 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Frazier v. State, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/6/04), ).
State v. Pearson 975 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Interiano, 03-1760, p. 4 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Hines 970 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Interiano, 03-1760 (La.2/13/04), .
State v. Delaney 965 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007