DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boykin, 858 So. 2d 416.

13 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Anthony O. Stokes La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    11/14/03); (where the defendant received the minimum 20-year enhanced sentence as a third-felony offender for his conviction of distribution of two rocks of cocaine with two prior convictions for possession of cocaine).
  • State v. Arceneaux 271 So. 3d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    11/14/03), (where the defendant received a 20-year enhanced sentence as a third felony offender for distribution of $ 20 worth of cocaine with two prior convictions for possession of cocaine).
  • State v. Ceasar 224 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    11/14/03), , the defendant was present for arraignment without counsel and entered pleas of not guilty.
  • State of Louisiana v. Roman Ford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    11/14/03), this court found that arraignment for an underlying charge was not a critical stage requiring the presence of counsel.
  • State v. Ford 217 So. 3d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    11/14/03), , this court found that arraignment for an underlying charge was not a critical stage requiring the presence of counsel.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tavares Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. George Jameson Gray, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Savoie 982 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 3/12/03) , , writ denied, 03-1157 (La.11/14/03), ) and that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to have counsel present at the gathering of print exemplars.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOSEPH THOMAS SAVOIE AKA JOSEPH TOMMY SAVOIE AKA JOSEPH THOMAS SAVOY La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    11/14/03), ) and that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to have counsel present at the gathering of print exemplars.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mack Henry Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Johnson 944 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 3/12/03) , , writ denied, 03-1157 (La.11/14/03), .
  • State v. Davis 937 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.03/05/03), , writ denied, 03-1158 (La.11/14/03), , this court observed: This "cleansing period" begins to run from the date that a defendant is actually discharged from state custody and supervision.
  • State v. Capers 938 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    2d Cir.3/5/03), , writ denied, 03-1158 (La.11/14/03), , this court observed: This "cleansing period" begins to run from the date that a defendant is actually discharged from state custody and supervision.