No. 2003-KO-499
Precedential
Processed
State v. Lott
State v. Lott, 864 So. 2d 129 (La. 2004).
Cited by
Explained in 1
- Bryan Mitnaul v. Michael J. Petrosh, Jr. & Andrea M. Rabalais Petrosh La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- Claudia Payne v. Aaron Lawrence, The Lawrence Law Firm, LLC & Christopher Gilbert La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- Dwayne Alexander v. the Louisiana State Board of Private Investigator Examiners La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
- Darlene Webber Versus Continental Casualty Company and Cristian P. Silva Law Office, LLC La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
- Ashton R. O'dwyer, Jr. and Alexis O'Dwyer Navarro (Both Appearing in Inpropria Persona) Versus … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
- Cesar Gonzales, MD v. Palmetto Addiction Recovery Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- Shanika Renee Green v. Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- Hal Carter and Dream Creations, LLC v. ABC News, Inc. D/B/A ABC News Productions … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- Joseph Thomas Bartucci, Jr. v. Stephen A. Jefferson, Esq. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
- Calvin W. Braxton, Sr. v. Louisiana State Troopers Association La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
- Dale Hartley v. University of Holy Cross La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
- Sonya Duhe Versus Loyola University of New Orleans, Tania Tetlow, and Michael Guisti La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Opinion text
CALOGERO, Chief Justice concurring. I concur in the denial of the defendant’s application for reconsideration. The appropriate remedy is through an application for post-conviction relief, filed initially in the trial court where a full evidentiary hearing can be conducted.