Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bleichner, 879 So. 2d 112.

275 citing documents.

Whetstone v. Jefferson Parish School Board 117 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), ; Brown v. Coastal Construction Engineering, Inc., 96-2705 (La.App.
Chatagnier v. 1st A Southeast Incs, L.L.C. 115 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
^DISCUSSION Standard of Review In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard, Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Salomone v. Greater Gulf Coast Auto Auctions, Inc. 115 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
McCorkle v. Management Services USA, Inc. 113 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Marti v. City of New Orleans 115 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/1/12), -67 (citing Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), ).
Carolyn Davis v. Tri-Parish Rehabilitation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Anthony Kinard v. New Iberia Wastewater Treatment Facility La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
7/6/04), (citations omitted).
Kinard v. New Iberia Wastewater Treatment Facility 116 So. 3d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), (citations omitted).
Davis v. Tri-Parish Rehabilitation 112 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Garcia v. Hico, Inc. 113 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04); .
Morvant v. Shop Rite, Inc. 108 So. 3d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Hervey J. Morvant v. Shop-Rite, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Dubuisson v. Amclyde Engineered Products Co. 112 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Sider-Jeffery v. Jefferson Parish Public School System 105 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
LAW AND ANALYSIS In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), , the court stated: | rJn worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the ‘manifest error-clearly wrong’ standard.
Flores v. Angelle Apartments Co. 106 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
LAW AND ANALYSIS In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), , the court stated: In worker’s (sic) compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the ‘manifest error-clearly wrong’ standard.
Linda Miles v. Pinecrest Developmental Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04)
Miles v. Pinecrest Developmental Center 101 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Bilquist v. Custom Craft Homes, Inc. 105 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Const., 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Brenda Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Miller v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 100 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Spence v. Excelsior Endeavors & Development, Inc. 125 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/14/09) ; citing Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Brown v. Almanza 102 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), ; Johnson v. State, 02-2382 (La.5/20/03), ; First Communication Co. v. Jefferson Parish, 97-608 (La.App.
Blake v. Turner Industries Group, LLC 111 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Hotard v. Murphy 97 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , citing, Brown v. Coastal Constr.
Hall v. Macpapers, Inc. 95 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 2004-1278, p. 15 (La.3/11/05), ; Dean v. Southmark Constr., 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), ; Masinter v. Akal Sec., Inc., 2005-1236, p. 3 (La.App.
Philip Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/27/07), : In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03–1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Richards v. St. Bernard Parish Government 91 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. 94 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), : In Dean v. Southmark Const, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court stated: In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Baker v. Phillips Van Heusen Corp. 91 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Const., 2003-1051 (La.07/06/04), .
Deloris K. Stenson v. Pat's of Henderson Seafood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Viney J. Silas v. Sowela Technical College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/27/07), (alteration in original): In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Stenson v. Pat's of Henderson Seafood 84 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Silas v. Sowela Technical College 84 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 2/7/07), , writ denied, 07-507 (La.4/27/07), (alteration in original): In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Gray v. Marriott Residence Inn 85 So. 3d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Gabriel v. Lafourche Parish Water District 80 So. 3d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051 (La.07/06/04), , (citing Brown v. Coastal Constr.
Nivens v. Fields 79 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Morgan v. Glazers Wholesale Drug Co. 79 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Raymond Hymes, Jr. v. Congregation of the Immaculate Conception La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error–clearly wrong” standard.
Kenneth D. Lopez v. Town of Zwolle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Dallas Richard v. Coastal Culvert & Supply, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
James Lynch v. a Door Works, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Lynch v. a DOOR WORKS, INC. 72 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Lopez v. TOWN OF ZWOLLE 74 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
LAW AND DISCUSSION Standard of Review The WCJ’s findings of fact are reviewed under the “manifest error” or “clearly wrong standard.” Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Hymes v. Congregation of the Immaculate Conception 75 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
LAW AND DISCUSSION In Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court stated: In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Richard v. Coastal Culvert & Supply, Inc. 76 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/24/06), -02 (quoting Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), ).
Patterson v. General Motors Co. 73 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Const., 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Ford v. HOUSE OF RAEFORD 71 So. 3d 1157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
Davenport v. Foster Farms, L.L.C. 69 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Co., 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), ; Banks v. Industrial Roofing & Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 96-2840 (La.7/1/97), .
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 70 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Tulane University Hospital & Clinic v. Lockheed Martin Corp. 70 So. 3d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
*990 LAW AND ANALYSIS: “In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the manifest error-clearly wrong’ standard.” Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .