Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bleichner, 879 So. 2d 112.

275 citing documents.

Janneck v. LWCC 70 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Partello v. Nunez Construction 69 So. 3d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
“In workers’ compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the ‘manifest error-clearly wrong* standard.” Dean v. Southmark Const., 2003-1015, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), (quoting Brown v. Coastal Construction & Engineering, Inc., 96-2705 (La.App.
Harrelson v. Arcadia 68 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Mayes v. DEEP SOUTH CHEMICAL, INC. 66 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
In Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), , a carpenter was injured while traveling to work when his direct employer deviated from his route to stop at another job site.
Ralph Mayes v. Deep South Chemical, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
7/6/04), a carpenter was injured 1 Mayes contends that he regularly worked from 3:00 a.m.
Danielle C. Garrick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Garrick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 66 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
LAW AND DISCUSSION Standard of Review The WCJ’s findings of fact are reviewed under the “manifest error-clearly wrong standard.” Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Mayes v. Deep South Chemical, Inc. 66 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), , a carpenter was injured Iswhile traveling to work when' his' direct employer deviated from his route to stop at another job site.
Avenue Surgical Suites v. Jo Ellen Smith Convalescent Center 66 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278, p. 15 (La.3/11/05), ; Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), ; Masinter v. Akal Sec., Inc., 05-1236, p. 3 (La.App.
Jerry Wayne Benoit v. Turner Industries Group, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Benoit v. Turner Industries Group, LLC 63 So. 3d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The WCJ’s findings of fact are reviewed under the “manifest error” or “clearly wrong standard.” Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Dunlap v. Madison Parish School Board 61 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Dean v. South-mark Const,, 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Williams v. Orleans Parish School Board 61 So. 3d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Michael Broussard v. Country Club Auto Repair, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Broussard v. Country Club Auto Repair 56 So. 3d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Contr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Hofler v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. 57 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Const., 2003-1051 (La.07/06/04), ; Thompson v. The Animal Hosp, supra.
Poissenot v. St. Bernard Parish Sheriff's Office 56 So. 3d 170 La. 2011
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Bell v. Mid City Printers, Inc. 54 So. 3d 1226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Steinfelds v. Villarubia 53 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003 1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), ; See also MacFarlane v. Schneider Nat.
Cheryl F. Benoit v. Ace Transportation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Brian Hesser v. Nabors Drilling USA, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Hesser v. NABORS DRILLING USA, LP 52 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Benoit v. ACE Transportation 51 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1 Cir.2003), [, writ denied, 03-2581 (La.11/26/03), ], Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Merrill v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 52 So. 3d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Peters v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 52 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Barbara Carradine v. Regis Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Carradine v. Regis Corp. 52 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Angela Ashworth v. Administaff, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Ashworth v. Administaff, Inc. 48 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Laird v. Highpoint Southwest Services 49 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), ; MacFarlane v. Schneider National Bulk Carriers, Inc., 07-1386, p. (La.App.
Duplessis v. Tulane University Medical Center 47 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Rosemary Delrie v. Peabody Magnet High School La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Robert Minor v. J & J Carpet, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Minor v. J & J CARPET, INC. 40 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Delrie v. Peabody Magnet High School 40 So. 3d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Gerald Moss v. Tommasi Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
7/6/04), (citations omitted), wherein the court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Ragle Celestine v. Firestone Polymers, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Linda Breaux v. Northwestern State University La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Breaux v. NORTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY 36 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Celestine v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C. 38 So. 3d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Moss v. Tommasi Construction, Inc. 37 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
|„LAW AND DISCUSSION The standard of review applicable in workers’ compensation cases was set out by our supreme court in Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), (citations omitted), wherein the court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Robert J. Lejeune v. Bell Tower Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Keith Smith v. Boise Cascade, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
7/6/04), the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
Smith v. BOISE CASCADE, LLC 34 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
LeJEUNE v. BELL TOWER CORP. 34 So. 3d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
Montgomery v. Lafayette Parish School Board 31 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051 (La.07/06/04), ; Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite, 93-1698 (La.01/14/94), .
Connor v. Family Dollar Store 36 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
Sandra Williams v. Ace Transportation, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Douglas Richardson v. Lil River Harvesting La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
7/6/04), (citations omitted).
Elizabeth A. Tilley v. Boise Cascade Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by