DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Bleichner, 879 So. 2d 112.

275 citing documents.

  • Richardson v. Lil' River Harvesting 33 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), (citations omitted).
  • Tilley v. Boise Cascade Corp. 32 So. 3d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See footnote 2 in Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Williams v. Ace Transportation, Inc. 33 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Key v. Monroe City School Board 32 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Buxton v. Iowa Police Dept., 2009-0520, p. 18 (La.10/20/09), ; Dean v. Southmark Const., 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), ; Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite, 93-1698 (La.1/14/94), .
  • Billy Ray Woodard v. Town of Colfax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    5/5/06), we reviewed the standard of review and the claimant’s burden of proof in a workers’ compensation case: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: 4 In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact
  • Woodard v. TOWN OF COLFAX 29 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -801 , wits denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , we reviewed the standard of review and the claimant’s burden of proof in a workers’ compensation case: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: I.Jn worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly w
  • Reinhardt v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS (NOPD) 30 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Edward Montgomery v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    07/06/04), Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite, 93-1698 (La.
  • Dexter Mitchell v. Artcrete, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Mitchell v. ARTCRETE, INC. 24 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Southmark Const, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Katherine Williams v. Tioga Manor Nursing Home La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    7/6/04), : In worker’s [sic] compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Williams v. Tioga Manor Nursing Home 24 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    OPINION The standard of review applying in workers’ compensation cases was set forth by the supreme court in Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , 117: In worker’s [sic] compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Negri v. Authement Construction, Inc. 28 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Albert Journet, Jr. v. Greene's Energy Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    7/6/04), (citations omitted).
  • Journet v. Greene's Energy Group 20 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), (citations omitted).
  • Decquir v. Acorn 18 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Bobby L. Shirley v. J & S Dozer Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Proof of work-related accident In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the [Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC’s)] findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Shirley v. J & S DOZER SERVICES, INC. 12 So. 3d 1109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Proof of work-related accident In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the [Office of Workers’ Compensation (OWC’s) ] findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Ledford v. New Orleans Saints 10 So. 3d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Soubhmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Dorion v. Gulf States Asphalt Co., L.P. 14 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), (citations omitted).
  • Reed v. St. Francis Medical Center 8 So. 3d 824 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Southmark Construction, 2003-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Gregory Scott v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In that case, we said: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly
  • Scott v. City of Pineville 8 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In that case, we said: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Joseph H. Fontenot, Jr. v. Wal-Mart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Fontenot v. Wal-Mart 5 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • David Bailey v. Aecom La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    4/27/07), : In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Shane M. Sartelle v. Footlocker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    In that case, we said: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court 1 discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findi
  • Sartelle v. Footlocker 996 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In that case, we said: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court 12discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • MacFarlane v. SCHNEIDER NAT. BULK CARRIERS 984 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Dean v. Southmark Construction, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Hamilton v. Compass Group USA/Morrison 973 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    In that case, the court said: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the Supreme Court discussed the standard of review in workers' compensation cases: In worker's compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC's findings of fact is the "manifest error-clearly wrong" standard.
  • Christopher Cormier v. State of La., Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Cormier v. STATE, DEPT. OF WILDLIFE 970 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 5/24/06), -02 , citing, Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Royals v. Town of Richwood 968 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Dean v. Southmark Construction, XXXX-XXXX (La.7/6/04), ; Pardee v. Forest Haven Nursing Home, supra .
  • State of Louisiana, Through the Sabine River Authority v. Meyer & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State ex rel. Sabine River Authority v. Meyer & Associates, Inc. 967 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Dean v. Southmark Constr., 03-1051 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Lynn Dousay Dba Dousay Floor v. Donnie Dousay La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    7/6/04), (citations omitted).
  • Donnie Dousay v. Dousay Floor Covering La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    7/6/04), (citations omitted).
  • Dousay v. Dousay Floor Covering 966 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), (citations omitted).
  • Bennett v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital 965 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Dean v. Southmark Const., 2003-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Kenneth D. Lopez v. Town of Zwolle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In that case, we said: 15 16 In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 17 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court 18 discussed the standard of review in workers' compensation 19 cases: 20 21 In worker’s compensation cases, the 22 appropriate standard of review to be applied 23 by the appellate court to the O
  • Lopez v. Town of Zwolle 963 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    In that case, we said: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Sheryl Charles v. Lake Charles Memorial Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • TALYOR v. JC Penney 959 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "[i]n worker's [sic] compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC's [Office of Workers' Compensation's] findings of fact is the `manifest error-clearly wrong' standard."
  • Ella Mae Smith v. Kinder Retirement and Rehabilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Smith v. KINDER RETIREMENT AND REH. CENTER 954 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Gomon v. Melancon 960 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
  • Timothy Butterfield v. Turner Industries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    7/6/04), the supreme court stated: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Carla Sowell v. Process Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    7/6/04), (citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases as follows: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong”
  • Sowell v. Process Equipment 948 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), (citations omitted), the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases as follows: In worker’s compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC’s findings of fact is the “manifest error-clearly wrong” standard.
  • Butterfield v. Turner Industries 951 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    *479 In Dean v. Southmark Const., 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court stated: In worker's compensation cases, the appropriate standard of review to be applied by the appellate court to the OWC's findings of fact is the "manifest error-clearly wrong" standard.