Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Aulston, 918 So. 2d 461.

60 citing documents.

  • In Re: Christopher Antonio Tyson La. 2025
  • In Re: Daryl Andre Gray La. 2025
  • In Re: James Arthur Graham, Jr. La. 2024
  • In Re: Jonathan B. Andry La. 2023
  • In Re: Mary Holly Hammett La. 2023
  • In Re: Robert Wiegand, II La. 2022
  • In Re: Lynn Plaisance Johnson La. 2022
  • In Re: Richard L. Reynolds La. 2022
  • In Re: Cynthia Ann Lain La. 2021
  • In Re: Joseph Harold Turner, Jr. La. 2021
  • In Re: Vincent Wilkins, Jr. La. 2021
  • In re Franks 273 So. 3d 302 La. 2019
  • In re Anthony 268 So. 3d 287 La. 2019
  • In re Deaguero 267 So. 3d 586 La. 2019
  • In re Wiegand 267 So. 3d 64 La. 2019
  • In re Kleinsmith 263 So. 3d 1146 La. 2019
  • In re Megwa 252 So. 3d 449 La. 2018
  • In re Manning 252 So. 3d 451 La. 2018
  • In re Lotz 227 So. 3d 807 La. 2017
  • In re Mechem 227 So. 3d 809 La. 2017
  • In re O'Quinn 221 So. 3d 832 La. 2017
  • In re White 209 So. 3d 691 La. 2017
  • In re Segal 206 So. 3d 868 La. 2017
  • In re Kanwal 202 So. 3d 160 La. 2016
  • In re Vega 198 So. 3d 1176 La. 2016
    Furthermore, we feel there is no reason to deviate from the sanction imposed in Texas as only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the *1186 sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction; In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Ward 195 So. 3d 436 La. 2016
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Aldous 195 So. 3d 439 La. 2016
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Schmidt 196 So. 3d 601 La. 2016
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Minton 174 So. 3d 1136 La. 2015
    Furthermore, our jurisprudence recognizes that “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulstan, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Johnson 177 So. 3d 116 La. 2015
    This court’s jurisprudence recognizes that “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the |ñsanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Johnson 164 So. 3d 826 La. 2015
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Buehler 139 So. 3d 1008 La. 2014
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Thomas 132 So. 3d 1258 La. 2014
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Vega 124 So. 3d 456 La. 2013
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Beal 117 So. 3d 501 La. 2013
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re White 113 So. 3d 1083 La. 2013
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Alderman 110 So. 3d 545 La. 2013
    Moreover, reciprocal disciplinary matters involve unique considerations, and “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Davidson 99 So. 3d 18 La. 2012
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Rushing 98 So. 3d 284 La. 2012
    Our jurisprudence recognizes that “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Walters 98 So. 3d 266 La. 2012
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In Re Rushing 74 So. 3d 708 La. 2011
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Nunnery 72 So. 3d 850 La. 2011
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/18/06), .
  • In Re Cortigene 72 So. 3d 828 La. 2011
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In Re Kornfeld 62 So. 3d 62 La. 2011
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Sirgo 59 So. 3d 1255 La. 2011
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In re Bos 56 So. 3d 237 La. 2011
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In Re Walters 45 So. 3d 1016 La. 2010
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In Re Bright 44 So. 3d 679 La. 2010
    In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In Re Bailey 41 So. 3d 436 La. 2010
    We have recognized “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
  • In Re Bailey 34 So. 3d 853 La. 2010