Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite In re Aulston, 918 So. 2d 461.
- In Re: Christopher Antonio Tyson La. 2025
- In Re: Daryl Andre Gray La. 2025
- In Re: James Arthur Graham, Jr. La. 2024
- In Re: Jonathan B. Andry La. 2023
- In Re: Mary Holly Hammett La. 2023
- In Re: Robert Wiegand, II La. 2022
- In Re: Lynn Plaisance Johnson La. 2022
- In Re: Richard L. Reynolds La. 2022
- In Re: Cynthia Ann Lain La. 2021
- In Re: Joseph Harold Turner, Jr. La. 2021
- In Re: Vincent Wilkins, Jr. La. 2021
- In re Franks 273 So. 3d 302 La. 2019
- In re Anthony 268 So. 3d 287 La. 2019
- In re Deaguero 267 So. 3d 586 La. 2019
- In re Wiegand 267 So. 3d 64 La. 2019
- In re Kleinsmith 263 So. 3d 1146 La. 2019
- In re Megwa 252 So. 3d 449 La. 2018
- In re Manning 252 So. 3d 451 La. 2018
- In re Lotz 227 So. 3d 807 La. 2017
- In re Mechem 227 So. 3d 809 La. 2017
- In re O'Quinn 221 So. 3d 832 La. 2017
- In re White 209 So. 3d 691 La. 2017
- In re Segal 206 So. 3d 868 La. 2017
- In re Kanwal 202 So. 3d 160 La. 2016
-
In re Vega
198 So. 3d 1176
La. 2016
Furthermore, we feel there is no reason to deviate from the sanction imposed in Texas as only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the *1186 sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction; In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Ward
195 So. 3d 436
La. 2016
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Aldous
195 So. 3d 439
La. 2016
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Schmidt
196 So. 3d 601
La. 2016
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Minton
174 So. 3d 1136
La. 2015
Furthermore, our jurisprudence recognizes that “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulstan, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Johnson
177 So. 3d 116
La. 2015
This court’s jurisprudence recognizes that “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the |ñsanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Johnson
164 So. 3d 826
La. 2015
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Buehler
139 So. 3d 1008
La. 2014
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Thomas
132 So. 3d 1258
La. 2014
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Vega
124 So. 3d 456
La. 2013
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Beal
117 So. 3d 501
La. 2013
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re White
113 So. 3d 1083
La. 2013
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Alderman
110 So. 3d 545
La. 2013
Moreover, reciprocal disciplinary matters involve unique considerations, and “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Davidson
99 So. 3d 18
La. 2012
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Rushing
98 So. 3d 284
La. 2012
Our jurisprudence recognizes that “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Walters
98 So. 3d 266
La. 2012
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In Re Rushing
74 So. 3d 708
La. 2011
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Nunnery
72 So. 3d 850
La. 2011
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/18/06), .
-
In Re Cortigene
72 So. 3d 828
La. 2011
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In Re Kornfeld
62 So. 3d 62
La. 2011
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Sirgo
59 So. 3d 1255
La. 2011
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In re Bos
56 So. 3d 237
La. 2011
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In Re Walters
45 So. 3d 1016
La. 2010
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In Re Bright
44 So. 3d 679
La. 2010
In re: Aulston, 05-1546 (La.1/13/06), .
-
In Re Bailey
41 So. 3d 436
La. 2010
We have recognized “only under extraordinary circumstances should there be a significant variance from the sanction imposed by the other jurisdiction.” In re: Aulston, 05-1546, p. 6 (La.1/13/06), .
- In Re Bailey 34 So. 3d 853 La. 2010