Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State ex rel. D.R., 50 So. 3d 927.

45 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.F. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana in the Interest of S.C.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Vs. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana in the Interest of A.P. Vs. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana in the Interest of J.P. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 10/13/10), (observing that “a child adjudicated a delinquent in Louisiana is entitled to a broader scope and standard of review than the minimum required by the Due Process clause”).
State ex rel. D.S. 255 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 10/13/10), , 930.
State ex rel. W.S. 250 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 10/13/10), , 935 (observing that "a child adjudicated a delinquent in Louisiana is entitled to a broader scope and standard of review than the minimum required by the Due Process clause").
State ex rel. W.V. 246 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 10/13/10), , 930.
State ex rel. M.J. 160 So. 3d 1040 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 10/13/10), ; In re C.B., 97-2783, p. 10 (La.3/4/98), -97 .
State of Louisiana v. Ashaki Okung Kelly La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Kelly 153 So. 3d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. J.D. 154 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. A.J. 151 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. R.P. 150 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. K.M. 146 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Simms 143 So. 3d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/13/10), (“It is well settled that [a] defendant must state the basis for his objection when he makes it so that the trial judge has an opportunity to rule on it and prevent or cure an error.”).
State ex rel. X.F. 143 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 10/13/10), (citing In re C.B., 97-2783, p. 17 (La.3/4/98), ).
State ex rel. J.D. 129 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State ex rel. S.J. 129 So. 3d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
State ex rel. J.A.J. 128 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State ex rel. J.J. 125 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State ex rel. O.W. 160 So. 3d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
State ex rel. T.M. 105 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/13/10) , (citing In re C.B., 97-2783 (La.3/4/98), ).
State ex rel. Q.T. 100 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State ex rel. R.L. 95 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
State ex rel. R.H. 89 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State ex rel. T.M. 88 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State in Interest of Te 85 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 10/13/10), (quoting State in the Interest of Batiste, (La.
State in Interest of La 85 So. 3d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Marlowe 81 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 10/13/10), (“It is well settled that [a] defendant must state the basis for his objection when he makes it so that the trial judge has an opportunity to rule on it and prevent or cure an error.”, quoting Dupar, supra).
State ex rel. A.H. 80 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. R.V. 82 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 10/13/10), , 930 citing In re C.B., 97-2783, p. 17 (La.3/4/98), , 400.
State Ex Rel. Dm 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. of D.M. 80 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State ex rel. K.J. 71 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
App. 4 Cir. 10/13/10), -932 .
State Ex Rel. Kj 71 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
App. 4 Cir. 10/13/10), -932 .
State Ex Rel. Cj 63 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. A.H. 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Ah 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State ex rel. C.J. 63 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State ex rel. W.H. 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Wh 62 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Th 52 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State ex rel. T.H. 52 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State ex rel. D.R. 51 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 10/13/10) , , and State in the Interest of D.R., 10-0406 (La.App.4 Cir. 10/20/10), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by