Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gaten v. Tangipahoa Parish School System, 91 So. 3d 1073.

30 citing documents.

Pat Cooper v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
1 Cir. 3/23/12), ) (case citations omitted)), and explained: A final judgment must be identified as such by appropriate language.
Lexington Land Development, L.L.C. v. Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Dixon Management Corp., Kenmore Oil Co., … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
App. 1St Cir. 3/ 23/ 12), Johnson v. Mount Pilgrim Baptist Church, 2005- 0337 ( La.
Sean Michael Breen v. Kacie Magee Breen and ABC Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. I Cir. 3/ 23/ 12), Advanced Leveling & Concrete Solutions v. Lathan Company Inc., 2017- 1250 ( La.
St. Martin Parish Government v. Bryan Champagne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Sys., 11-1133, p. 3 (La.App 1 Cir. 3/23/12), ).
Doctors for Women Medical Center, LLC, Craig M. Landwehr MD, LLC and Craig M. Landwehr, MD in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In Re: Succession of the Estate of Robert Charles Johnson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Renee Jackson & Antione Coleman Versus Liberty Personal Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Kenneth Berthelot v. Russell Indovina and Progressive Security Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 1st Cir. 3/ 23/ 12)
Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, k/d/s Promix, L.L.C., and Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Donald Colligan v. Maison De Lafayette Nursing Home La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Lewis v. B-3 Prop. 258 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1 Cir. 3/23/12), , 1074 (finding that a judgment which simply states that a "Motion for *110 Summary Judgment is Granted," without decretal language disposing of or dismissing the claims, is defective and cannot be considered as a "final judgment"); In re Med.
Dearmon v. St. Ann Lodging, L.L.C. 255 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1 Cir. 3/23/12), , 1074 (finding that a judgment which simply states that a "Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted," without decretal language disposing of or dismissing the claims, is defective and cannot be considered as a "final judgment"); In re Med.
Rathe v. Rathe 256 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 3/23/12), , 1074 ; Johnson v. Mount Pilgrim Baptist Church , 2005-0337 (La.
Harrison v. Nature's Way Safety Solutions, LLC 251 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 3/23/12), , 1074.
Martinez v. Wilson 248 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 3/23/12), , 1074.
Moulton v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 226 So. 3d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 1 Cir. 3/23/12), (finding that a judgment which simply states that a “Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted,” without decretal language disposing of or dismissing the claims, is defective and cannot be considered as a “final judgment”); In re Med.
Melody Smith v. Marcus Sam La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Contreras v. Vesper 202 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
*1189 App. 1 Cir. 3/23/12), .
Kathryn Elizabeth Holland v. Paul Scott Holland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Holland v. Holland 188 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Moon v. City of New Orleans 190 So. 3d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Barajas-Meraz v. Valdovinos-Moreno 190 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1 Cir. 3/23/12) , , As indicated above, the December 23, 2014 judgment consisted of the handwritten words, “JUDGMENT Denied,” written across the proposed judgment of divorce, with the judge’s signature and the date.
Gary Morgan v. Craig Stephen Pardue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Morgan v. Pardue 175 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Perkins v. BBRC Investments, LLC 205 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Paula Fortenberry v. Continental Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Mack I. Frank v. City of Eunice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Frank v. City of Eunice 134 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Karl E. Kimsey v. National Automotive Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Kimsey v. National Automotive Insurance Co. 153 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014