Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 84 So. 3d 479.

40 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Davieontray Lee Breaux La. 2025
1/24/12), (quoting Harrah’s Bossier City Investment Company, LLC v. Bridges, 09-1916 (La.
John Callis v. Greater Alexandria Economic Development Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana, by and Through Its Attorney General, Liz Murrill v. Abbvie, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
In Re: Kristen Nicole Dennis and Jessica Falcon Dennis Applying for Intrafamily Adoption of J.K.D. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Explained Home Bank, N. A. v. Golden La Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
1/24/12), (quoting Harrah’s Bossier City Inv.
Opelousas General Hospital Authority, a Public Trust v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company D/B/A Blue cross/blue Shield … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
1/24/12), (emphasis added).
Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Sheriff and Ex-Officio Tax Collector for the Parish of Jefferson Versus travelocity.com Lp (n/K/A … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
1/24/12), rehearing denied 3/9/12.
Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
1/ 24/ 12), LSA- R. S. 1: 4.
Louisiana State University System Board of Supervisors Through Louisiana State University Veterinarian Teaching Hospital v. Robert Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Daryl G. Purpera, in his official capacity as Louisiana Legislative Auditor and as Chairman of the Task Force … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana in the Interest of L.P. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Lerner New York, Inc. Versus Newell D. Normand, Sheriff, and Ex-Officio Tax Collector for Jefferson Parish; Jefferson Parish … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
1/24/12), rehearing denied 3/9/12.
Jean v. James River Ins. Co. 274 So. 3d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1/24/12), , 483 ; Harrah's Bossier City Inv.
Joseph Kolwe, Jr. v. Civil and Structural Engineers,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1/24/12), (internal citations omitted).
Kolwe v. Civil & Structural Eng'rs, Inc. 264 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
1/24/12), , 483 (internal citations omitted).
Normand v. Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC 263 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/24/12), , 483 (internal citation omitted).
Woods v. Robinson 256 So. 3d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Lewis 254 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
S. Farm Bureau Life Ins. Co. v. Cox 247 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1/24/12), , 484-5, the supreme court observed: Other fundamental rules of statutory construction lead to the same result.
New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans 242 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/24/12), , 483 (citations omitted).
Pertuit v. La. Sch. Emps. Ret. Sys. 237 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Louisiana Chemical Ass'n v. State, Louisiana Department of Revenue 217 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Barfield v. Bolotte 185 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 2011-1141 (La.1/24/12), .
Casey v. Casey 196 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
placing a construction on the provision in question that is consistent with the express terms of the law and with the obvious intent of the Legislature in enacting it.” McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 2011-1141, p. 6 (La.1/24/12), (citations omitted).
Odebrecht Construction, Inc. v. Louisiana Department of Revenue 182 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 2011-1141 (La.1/24/12), , the Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly stated the requirements for the judicial interpretation of statutes: “It is a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that when a ‘law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be applied [as] .
Nelson Industrial Steam Co. v. Calcasieu Parish School Board,sales & Use Tax Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1/24/12), the Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly stated the requirements for the judicial interpretation of statutes: “It is a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that when a ‘law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be a
Cynthia Bridges, SEC. Dept. of Rev., State v. Nelson Industrial Steam Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1/24/12), the Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly stated the requirements for the judicial interpretation of statutes: “It is a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that when a ‘law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be a
Nelson Industrial Steam Co. v. Calcasieu Parish School System Sales and Use Tax Dept. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1/24/12), the Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly stated the requirements for the judicial interpretation of statutes: “It is a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that when a ‘law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be a
Cynthia Bridges, SEC. Dept. of Rev., State of Louisiana v. Nelson Industrial Steam Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1/24/12), the Louisiana Supreme Court succinctly stated the requirements for the judicial interpretation of statutes: “It is a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that when a ‘law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be a
Gamestop, Inc. v. St. Mary Parish Sales & Use Tax Department 166 So. 3d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 11-1141, p. 6 (La.1/24/12), .
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Cardenas, III 145 So. 3d 362 La. 2014
McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 11-1141, p. 9 (La.1/24/12), (“This Court has held that it is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that when two statutes deal with the same subject matter, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.
Dillard University v. Barfield 140 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Caldwell v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., 12-2447, 12-2466, 2014 WL 341038, at 6 , (La.1/28/14) (citing McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 11-1141, pp. 5-6 (La.1/24/12) ; In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9, ).
Ogea v. Merritt 130 So. 3d 888 La. 2013
See McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 11-1141, pp. 6-7 (La.1/24/12), .
Catahoula Parish School Board v. Louisiana Machinery Rentals, LLC 124 So. 3d 1065 La. 2013
Civ.Code art. 9; McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 11-1141, pp. 5-6 (La.1/24/12), .
Bridges v. Bullock 124 So. 3d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 2011-1141, p. 5-6, (La.1/24/12), , and cases cited therein.
Normand v. 1st Lake Realty, Inc. 119 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 11-1141 (La.1/24/12), .
McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges 110 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
[,In McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 2011-1141 (La.1/24/12), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that “La.
Ogden v. Gray 99 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In the recent case of McLane Southern, Inc. v. Bridges, 11-1141, pp. 5-7 (La.1/24/12), , the Court stated: “It is a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation that when a ‘law is clear and unambiguous and its application does not lead to absurd consequences, the law shall be applied a written, and no further interpretation may be made in search of the intent of the legislature.’ ” Harrah’s B
LeBlanc v. Lavergne 86 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
McLane S., Inc., v. Bridges, Sec., Dep’t of Rev. of State of La., 11-1141 (La.1/24/12), .