Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Trascher v. Territo, 89 So. 3d 357.

23 citing documents.

ETC Texas Pipeline, LTD v. Louisiana Energy Gateway, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
5/8/12), Port City Glass & Paint Inc. v. Brooks, 52,534 (La.
Jamar A. Flowers v. Adrienne D. Tasker La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Michael and Susan Smith v. Bradley and Angelique Grantham, and Veronica Mosgrove La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Pablo Danilo Gonzalez Versus Destiny Wricks and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Succession of Dorothy Terrell Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
5/8/12), that “[a] party may not complain on appeal about an evidentiary ruling in the trial court unless the trial judge was given the opportunity to avoid the perceived error, and the ruling ‘affected’ a ‘substantial right’ of the party.” In Bayou Bridge Pipeline, LLC v. 38.00 Acres, 19-565, pp. 22–23 (La.App
Amy Salter v. DeSoto Parish Police Jury and Jean Simpson Personnel Services La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
5/8/12), citing Frank L. Maraist, Evidence & Proof, 2 ed. (19 La.
Jose Rodriguez-Zaldivar and Dylcio Rodriguez Cruz v. Charles Leggett and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Richard and Patricia Pannell v. the City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/8/12), (citing Frank L. Maraist, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Evidence and Proof, Vol.
Daniel T. Guidry v. Prime Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/8/12), (internal quotations omitted) (citations omitted).
Germain Dodson v. Master Lube Express Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
5/8/12), Port City Glass & Paint Inc. v. Brooks, 52,534 (La.
Thind Enterprises, LLC v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5/8/12), (emphasis added): A ruling on the admissibility of evidence is a question of law and is not subject to the manifest error standard of review.
Berry v. Anco Insulations 273 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
5/8/12), , citing Frank L. Maraist, Evidence & Proof , 2 ed. (19 La.
Port City Glass & Paint Inc. v. Simmie Brooks 266 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Holloway Drilling Equipment, Inc. v. Billy Guidroz, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/8/12), for the foregoing proposition.
Holloway Drilling Equip., Inc. v. Guidroz 254 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/8/12), , for the foregoing proposition.
Gregory Scarborough v. Tonya D. Scarborough La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Board of Ethics In re Monsour 233 So. 3d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Randazzo v. St. Bernard Parish Government 219 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/8/12), (internal quotations omitted) (citations omitted).
Timothy Schouest, Jr. v. Acadian Construction Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/8/12), (citing 19 FRANK L. MARAIST, CIVIL LAW TREATISE: EVIDENCE AND PROOF § 2.10 AT 36 (2D ED. 2008)).
Matranga v. Parish Anesthesia of Jefferson, LLC 170 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Trascher v. Territo, 11-2093 (La.05/08/12), , see also La.
Sullivan v. City of Baton Rouge 170 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also Trascher v. Territo, 11-2093 (La.5/8/12), ("A party may not complain on appeal about an evidentiary ruling unless the trial judge was given the opportunity to avoid the perceived error, and the ruling 'affected' a ‘substantial right’ of the party.”) .
Livingston C. Guidry, Et Ux. v. Kysha Lashane Bernard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Guidry v. Bernard 142 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Trascher v. Territo, 11-2093 (La.5/8/12), ().