Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mulkey v. Mulkey, 118 So. 3d 357.

52 citing documents.

Devan Simpson v. Joshua Jagneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Lance Boudreaux v. Carley Webster La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Brandy Megan Broussard Wadsworth v. Christopher David Wadsworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Brittany Nicole Sharp v. Joshua Malone Jordan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
5/ 7/ 13), Melton v. Johnson, 2018- 0403 ( La.
Anthony E. Hill v. Christine Strickland La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
John Pickney Morgan v. Feliciana Lopez Morgan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
5/ 7113), Melton v. Johnson, 2018- 0403 ( La.
Donald E. Wagoner v. Krisann J. Munoz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Modification of Custody The Louisiana Supreme Court stated in Mulkey v. Mulkey, 12-2709, pp. 9–15, –367 (footnotes omitted): The primary consideration in a determination of child custody is the best interest of the child.
Obianuju T. Obi Versus Maduabuchi O. Onunkwo La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Susana F. Moody v. Ross Moody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
5/7/13), –65 (footnotes omitted), reviewed the burden of proof required to change custody set forth in a considered decree: The primary consideration in a determination of child custody is the best interest of the child.
Levi Austin Malone v. Brianne Leialoha Roberts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Faye Harvey & Nelford Harvey v. Laramie D. Harper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Lana Arender Gee v. Eric Daniel Gee La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana, Department of Children and Family Services, Child Support enforcement/iv-d Da v. David Alan Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
See also Mulkey v. Mulkey, 12-2709 (La.5/7/13)
Nicholas William Hodgkin v. Whitney L. Hodgkin La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Trish R. Veronie v. Joseph v. Van Brocklin Mireles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Jonathan Bergmann v. Trang Nguyen La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Kevin Belcher v. Kawanna Latrell Pace La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Jason M. Underwood v. Leigh A. Underwood La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Jesse Johnson v. Maranda Crader La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
“The determination of the trial court in child custody matters is entitled to great weight, and its discretion will not be disturbed on review in the absence of a clear showing of abuse.” Mulkey v. Mulkey, 12-2709, p.16 (La.5/7/13)
Nicholas Miller v. Teal Dicherry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
5/ 7/ 13), - 65; Bergeron, 492 So.
Jamie Killian Coody v. John Allen Coody La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Alejandra Carolina Guiterrez v. Joshua Lawrence Bruno La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Allan Keith Paille, Jr. v. Beatriz Trinidad Acosta Newell and James Keith Newell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Cornell Mark Joubert v. Francesca Antoinette Stewart Joubert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Cooper v. Chamberlain 266 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Ariatti v. Plaisance 255 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
England v. England 251 So. 3d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Harrel v. Harrel 251 So. 3d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
5/7/13), ; Chandler, supra .
Ronda Maxwell Hudson v. Clint Tucker Strother La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5/7/13), (footnotes omitted).
Hudson v. Strother 246 So. 3d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/7/13), , 364 (footnotes omitted).
Phillip Vidrine v. Danielle Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Vidrine v. Vidrine 245 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Mercer v. Mercer 249 So. 3d 924 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
5/7/13), , the court stated that while the heavy burden of proof in custody modification cases was justified for several reasons, the court was convinced that in a narrow class of cases, a modification of custody might be in the child's best interest even though the moving party is unable to show that the present custody is de
Hiatt v. Duhe 238 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5/7/13), , 367 ; Jaligam v. Pochampally , 16-0249, p. 6 (La.
Freeman v. Johnson 225 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State ex rel. Department of Children & Family Services, Child Support Enforcement ex rel. Bushman v. Knapp 216 So. 3d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Atkinson v. Atkinson 212 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
5/7/13), , the *635 Louisiana Supreme Court restated the Bergeron rule: [W]hen a party seeks to change custody rendered in a considered decree, the proponent of change must not only show that a change in circumstances materially affecting the welfare of the child has occurred since the prior order respecting custody, but he or
Brown v. Chategnier 208 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Jaligam v. Pochampally 206 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
George Mason, Jr. v. Deanna Harbison Mason La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
5/7/13), ] as designated by the Louisiana Supreme Court.
Mason v. Mason 203 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5/7/13), ,] as designated by the Louisiana Supreme Court.
Dazet v. Price 202 So. 3d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Tracie F. v. Francisco D. 188 So. 3d 231 La. 2016
5/7/13), (citing Gray v. Gray, 11-548, p. 19 (La.
Burrell v. State 184 So. 3d 246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
The intermediate standard “clear and convincing” means more than a “preponderance” but less than “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Mulkey v. Mulkey, 2012-2709 (La.05/07/13), .
Hilkirk v. Johnson 183 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See, e.g., Mulkey v. Mullcey, 12-2709, pp. 10-11 (La.5/7/13), .
Szwak v. Szwak 163 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
See Mulkey v. Mulkey, 12-2709 (La.05/07/13), ; Gerhardt v. Gerhardt, 46,463 (La.App.2d Cir.05/18/11), .
Distefano v. Distefano 169 So. 3d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
see also Mulkey v. Mulkey, 2012-2709 (La.5/7/13), -365 .
C.M.J. v. L.M.C., Wife of C.M.J. 156 So. 3d 16 La. 2014
Danny R Odell v. Billie Kellerhuis Odell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
5/7/13), (footnotes omitted).
Odell v. Odell 139 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Mulkey v. Mulkey, 12-2709, p. 11 (La.5/7/13), (footnotes omitted).