Succession of LeBouef
Succession of LeBouef, 153 So. 3d 527 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014).
Cited by
- Ronald Johnson v. Onshore Construction Company, L.L.C. and ABC Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2026
- Succession of John Kelley Martin La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- Successions of Daisy Lee Morris, wife of/and Levi Morris La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- Succession of Daisy Lee Morris Wife of/ and Levi Morris La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- Wendy Marie Martinez Couvillon v. Michael Andre Couvillon La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- In Re: Marshall Legacy Foundation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
- Succession of Manmohan Singh Dhaliwal Succession of Kailash K. Dhaliwal La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
- Succession of Mary Agnes Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
- Succession of Johnye Mae Madden La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
- Succession of James Conway Liner, III La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- Robert Jackson Davidson and Linda Wilburn Davidson v. Allan Neil Castillo and Castillo Investigation … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
- In re Dean 247 So. 3d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Capital City Press, LLC v. Louisiana State University System Board of Supervisors 120 So. 3d 250
- Castillo v. Normand 85 So. 3d 131
- In Reference to the Interdiction of Jones 54 So. 3d 54
- In Reference to the Interdiction of Jeannette Weadd Jones. 56 So. 3d 979
- Hodges v. Hodges 827 So. 2d 1271
- Hodges v. Hodges 828 So. 2d 1122
- Stiltner v. Stiltner 772 So. 2d 909
- Carrollton Presbyterian Church v. Presbytery of South Louisiana of the Presbyterian Church 77 So. 3d 975
- Carrollton Presbyterian Church v. Presbytery of South Louisiana 82 So. 3d 285
Opinion text
HIGGINBOTHAM, J., concurs in the result and assigns additional reasons. hi respectfully concur in the result reached by the majority and assign additional reasons to point out that the judgment at issue is immediately appealable because it imposed sanctions for contempt. See La.Code Civ. P. art. 1915(A)(6); Capital City Press, LLC v. Louisiana State *538 University System Bd. of Sup’rs, 2013-1994 (La.8/28/13), 120 So.3d 250 ; Robinson v. Harlan, 2012-0363 (La.4/9/12), 85 So.3d 131 ; In re Jones, 2010-0066 (La.App. 5th Cir.11/9/10), 54 So.3d 54, 58 , writ not considered, 2010-2738 (La.2/4/11), 56 So.3d 979 ; Hodges v. Hodges, 2002-0489 (La.App. 3d Cir.10/2/02), 827 So.2d 1271, 1276 , writ denied, 2002-2485 (La.11/8/02), 828 So.2d 1122 ; and Stiltner v. Stiltner, 2000-2079 (La.App. 4th Cir.11/8/00), 772 So.2d 909, 910 . Therefore, in the interests of judicial economy and justice, review of the entire judgment including the removal of the succession representatives is properly before this court on appeal. See Carrollton Presbyterian Church v. Presbytery of South Louisiana of Presbyterian Church (USA), 2011-0205 (La.App. 1st Cir.9/14/11), 77 So.3d 975 , 978-79„writ denied, 2011-2590 (La.2/17/12), 82 So.3d 285 , cert. denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 150 , 184 L.Ed.2d 32 (2012) (an appellant may appeal an interlocutory judgment involving the same or related issues in the case of a restricted appeal). The sanctions imposed for contempt in this case are related to the reasons for the removal of the succession co-administrators for breach of their fiduciary duties. For these additional reasons, the plaintiffs’ motion to summarily dismiss the defendants’ appeal should be denied and the appeal maintained.