Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 120 So. 3d 678.

40 citing documents.

Joan Marie Douglas v. Pathway Management of Louisiana, LLC and Community Care Center of Shreveport, South, LLC D/B/A … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
William R. Ticker individually and on behalf of McKenzie A. Ticker v. The State of Louisiana through the … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Catherine Evans, Et Al. v. Abubaker, Inc., Et Al. La. 2024
6/28/13), ; Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Co. , 01-2217, p. 7 (La.
John Hill and Nancy George, on Behalf of Their Daughter, Kayomoniqic George v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
6/28/13), Greer v. Johnson, 37,655, p. 5 (La.
Michael Smith v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
T. Scott Pernici, Michael Jones, and Mark Defatta, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Similarly Situated … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Traci Fernandez Versus City of Kenner, Tom Wilmott, Kristi Katsanis McKinney, Gregory Carrol, Michael Sigur, Glenn Hayes, George … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
Jason And Johnna Kunath, Individually And As Natural Tutor And Tutrix Of Grayson Kunath, Minor v. Samantha Faye … La. 2021
6/28/13), in order to determine legislative will, we must start with the language of the statute itself, interpreting the words used as they are generally understood; this court is bound to a strict interpretation of the plain language of the statutory provisions when the words of a statute are clear and unambiguous a
Joseph Robert, Gloria Decuir-Robert, Albert Bierria, Gwendolyn Bierra v. State of Louisiana and Abc Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
6/28/13), (citation omitted).
In Re: Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Cecily Rae Crane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
6/28/13), is instructive.
William Cook and Renee Soileau v. Carl Swayze Rigby, M.D. and Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
6/ 28/ 13), determined that if a non -health care provider is a joint tortfeasor with a health care provider, once a request for a medical review panel is filed, the rules that suspend the running of prescription against a health care provider, qualified or not qualified, will be applied to a non -health care provider.
MacRo Companies, Inc. v. Dearybury Oil & Gas, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
MacRo Companies, Inc. v. Dearybury Oil & Gas, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
William Cook and Renee Soileau v. Carl Swayze Rigby, M.D. and Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Joshua J. Foster v. the City of Leesville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
6/28/13), (citing Vizzi v. Lafayette City-Parish Consol.
Robin Larocca v. Primesource Building Products and ESIS La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
In re Med. Review Complaint By Daron Downing 272 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Enrico Bunyog v. Berkley Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Matranga v. Parish Anesthesia of Jefferson, LLC 254 So. 3d 1238 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Entergy Gulf States La., L.L.C. 243 So. 3d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Glenn Cook 226 So. 3d 387 La. 2017
Correro v. Ferrer 216 So. 3d 794 La. 2016
Brandi Billeaudeau, Veronica Billeaudeau, and Joseph Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority, Dr. Kondilo Skirlis-Zavala, and the Shumacher … 218 So. 3d 513 La. 2016
Daniel Arceneaux, Louis Daverede, Jr., Vives Lemmon and Jules Menesses v. Amstar Corp., Amstar Sugar Corp., Tate and … 200 So. 3d 277 La. 2016
6/28/13), -89 ; see also Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc., 07-2143 (La.
Truxillo v. Thomas 200 So. 3d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
40:1231.8 A(1)(a); Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.6/28/13), .
Passon v. Fields 196 So. 3d 645 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Bufkin v. Felipe’s Louisiana, LLC, 14-0288 (La.10/15/14), ; Milbert v. *651 Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.06/28/13), .
In Re: Medical Review Panel Claim of Rose Tillman C/W in Re: The Medical Review Panel Claim of … La. 2016
In Re: Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Peighton Miller v. Tulane Lakeside Hospital 187 So. 3d 445 La. 2016
Marino v. Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Co. 184 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 2; Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.06/28/13), .
Maestri v. Pazos 171 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
17Appellants contend that this case is similar to the facts in Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.6/28/13), , wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the timely request for a medical review panel against the health care providers suspended prescription under La.
Stoll v. Stich 166 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-022 (La.6/28/13), .
Finch v. HRI Lodging, Inc. 152 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.06/28/13), ; Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.03/10/06), .
Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLC 171 So. 3d 851 La. 2014
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.6/28/13), -88 .
Vidal Skinner v. State of La, Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Ed Grabowski, Et Ux. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
6/28/13), the supreme court addressed the issue of whether a duty was owed in a context similar to the one presented here: can a health care provider and a non-health care provider each owe a duty to the plaintiff patient and be joint tortfeasors for harm the plaintiff patient suffered?
Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. 149 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-22 (La.6/28/13), , the supreme court addressed the issue of whether a duty was owed in a context similar to the one presented here: can a health care provider and a non-health care provider each owe a duty to the plaintiff patient and be joint tortfeasors for harm the plaintiff patient suffered?
Skinner v. State 149 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-22, p. 15 (La.6/28/13), -88 .
Darren Dugas v. Bayou Teche Water Works, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
6/28/13), the supreme court considered prescription within the context of a motion for summary judgment, noting that the party urging prescription bears the burden of proof.
Dugas v. Bayou Teche Water Works, Inc. 153 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-22 (La.6/28/18), , the supreme court considered prescription within the context of a motion for summary judgment, noting that the party urging prescription bears the burden of proof.
Falcone v. Touro Infirmary 129 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022, p. 8 (La.6/28/13), [citations omitted].