Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 14 So. 2d 627.

72 citing documents.

Dennis Talbot Construction Co. v. Privat General Contractors, Inc. 60 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
However, , (1943), we permitted the subcontractor to recover his actual costs but not any overhead or profit.
Roy Sattler Construction, Inc. v. City of Bossier City 903 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Broadmoor, LLC v. ERNEST N. MORIAL EXHIBITION 867 So. 2d 651 La. 2004
New Orleans Rosenbush Claims Service, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 653 So. 2d 538 La. 1995
4th Cir.1973) , [14] So.2d 627 (La.1943) that the public bidding laws were enacted in the interest of and for the protection of the tax paying citizens, and that open competitive bidding is a thing to be desired.
VC Nora, Jr. Bldg. & Remodeling v. State, Through Department of Transportation and Development 635 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Barnco Intern., Inc. v. Arkla, Inc. 628 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
1 , (1949); , (1943); Templet v. Babbitt, 198 La.
Baker v. Southern University 590 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Associated Gen. Contractors v. Calcasieu Parish School Board 572 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Airline Const. v. Ascension Parish School Board 568 So. 2d 1029 La. 1990
Alonzo v. Chifici 526 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 504 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
9 , (1949); , (1943); A. V. Smith Construction Company, (La.App.
Pittman Const. Co., Inc. v. PARISH OF E. BATON ROUGE 493 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In Re Beychok 484 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Carr v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 451 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State Through Div. of Admin. v. Algernon Blair 445 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
See, , (1943); Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 210 La.
Hagberg v. John Bailey Contractor 435 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Albeit a contract made in violation of a prohibitory law is illegal and its enforcement is precluded, even though work has been done or materials furnished, , stated: "If the transactions in question were malum in se, that is, essentially and inherently evil and committed contrary to the principles of natural, moral and public law, we would have no hesitancy in following the stated view.
Bilongo v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 428 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Davis v. Franklin Parish School Bd. 412 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Budd Const. Co., Inc. v. City of Alexandria 401 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Council of City of New Orleans v. Morial 390 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1973) we reaffirmed the general rule *1364 , that the public bidding laws were enacted in the interest of and for the protection of the tax paying citizens, and that open competitive bidding is a thing to be desired.
State, Through Office of Governor v. LW EATON CONST. CO. 392 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Boxwell v. *480 Department of Highways, , (1943).
Williams v. BOARD OF SUP'RS, ETC. 388 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Pelican Aviation Corp. v. Airport Authority for the Parish of Iberia 372 So. 2d 1266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Haughton Elevator Division v. STATE, ETC. 367 So. 2d 1161 La. 1979
9 , (1949); Boxwell v. *1165 Dept. of Highways, , , 631 (1943).
College Associates v. City of Baton Rouge 369 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
St. James Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Commissioners 354 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
267 , , , as well as authorities from other jurisdictions.
Martin v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition Dist. 349 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
4th Cir. 1973); , (1943).
Lafourche Parish Water Dist. v. Carl Heck Engrs. 346 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
erpretation of the Fisher case in its brief, stated that the Fisher case now clearly reflects the present rule of law in Louisiana and requires contracts for consultant services to be let on the basis of competitive bidding and maintains that its interpretation is consistent with the purpose of the Public Bid Law as declared by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in Boxwell v. Department of Highways [ ], [1943], but in the 1975 Stevens case the Supreme Court clearly stated: `The Public Bid Law is a s
Haskins v. Clary 338 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
(1943), plaintiff supplied material to the State Highway Commission on void contracts and was permitted to recover actual cost of material without any allowance for profit or expenses incurred.
Harp v. Town of Lake Providence 338 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Wallace Stevens, Inc. v. LaFourche Parish Hosp. Dist. No. 3 323 So. 2d 794 La. 1975
Giles v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass'n 306 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
See: Corbello v. Jefferson Davis Parish Police Jury, La.App., (1972); Fisher v. State through the Department of Labor, La.App., (1972); , (1943).
Wallace Stevens, Inc. v. Lafourche Parish Hospital District 3 308 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1943), stated the purpose of the Public Bid Law as follows : “This statute in so far as it requires advertising and the obtaining of competitive bids is a prohibitory law founded on public policy.
Coleman v. Bossier City 305 So. 2d 444 La. 1974
DJ Talley & Son, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 303 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
(1943); Smith v. Town of Vinton, 216 La.
Coleman v. City of Bossier City 291 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
(1943) and Smith v. Town of Vinton, 216 La.
Succession of Killingsworth 292 So. 2d 536 La. 1974
9 , (1949) , (1943), the recipient receives certain advantages resulting from an illegal contract which was entered into in good faith by plaintiff.
New Orleans Transfer Company, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 284 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
(1943), in which the court stated: "This statute in so far as it requires advertising and the obtaining of competitive bids is a prohibitory law founded on public policy.
Succession of Killingsworth 270 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
9 , (1949) , (1943), the recipient receives certain advantages resulting from an illegal contract which was entered into in good faith by plaintiff.
Tuttle v. Schlater 270 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
9 , (1949) , (1943), the recipient receives certain advantages resulting from an illegal contract which was entered into in good faith by plaintiff.
Corbello v. Jefferson Davis Parish Police Jury 262 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
at 632 (1943); Smith v. Town of Vinton, 216 La.
Pugh v. Town of Logansport 235 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Under similar circumstances the Supreme Court, , (1943), made this appropriate observation: “Under these circumstances it would clearly be unjust to permit the Commission to reap the mentioned benefits and escape liability for them altogether.
Louisiana Paving Co. v. Louisiana Department of Highways 205 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
1029 , ; , ; Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State, 213 La.
Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. Burgess 202 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
the court, in dealing with a contract granted in violation of the state’s low bidder statute requiring public advertisement and competitive bids, stated: “This statute in so far as it requires advertising and the obtaining of competi-~ tive bids is a prohibitory law founded on public policy.
Freeman v. Department of Highways 197 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Southern Construction Co. v. Housing Authority of Opelousas 189 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Miller v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 190 So. 2d 75 La. 1966
Makofsy v. Department of Highways, 205 La.
Pittman Const. Co. v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 169 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
519 , ) , , wherein it was said: "It is generally held that a state or its agencies cannot be compelled to pay interest upon unpaid accounts unless provision is made therefor by stipulation or by a specific statute; general laws relative to the payment of interest are not applicable.
TL James & Co. v. Jefferson Parish Council 161 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board 159 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
1029 , ; , ) it was not liable for costs, except stenographers’ costs for talcing testimony, or for interest in the absence of a contractual stipulation or specific statutory provision therefor.