Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Atkins, 399 So. 2d 1161.

54 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Yvenert Dolce La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. John Noehl and Analise Noehl La. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Justin D. Grimsley La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Niesha Willis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Alex Francisco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
4 Cir. 12/18/96), ( 1251 (La.App 4 Cir.) writ denied, ()), where the fourth circuit noted that the term ‘“extreme physical pain’” refers to ‘“a condition which most people of common intelligence can understand; it is considered subjective in nature and susceptible to interpretation.’” The Hernandez court upheld a conviction of second degree battery wher
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 1988), quoting State v. Thompson , , 1168 (La.1981).
State v. Klein 252 So. 3d 973 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Art. 703D ("the state shall have the burden of proving the admissibility of a purported confession or statement by the defendant"); State v. Thompson , , 1167-1168 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Hank Allen Moran AKA - Hank Moran La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Moran 218 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 11/14/96), ().
State of Louisiana v. Andre J. Davis 221 So. 3d 28 La. 2017
This court noted it had determined in an earlier case that A>extreme physical pain= Y >describes a condition which most people of common intelligence can understand.=@ Stowe, 635 So.2d at 171 ( (La.
State v. Lundy 195 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Art. 703 D (“the state shall have the burden of proving the admissibility of a purported confession or statement by the defendant”); -1168 (La.1981).
State v. Buhcannon 112 So. 3d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
at p. 6, 857 So.2d at 1027 ().
State v. Harris 98 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Art. 703 D (“the state shall have the burden of proving the admissibility of a purported confession or statement by the defendant”); -1168 (La.1981).
State of Louisiana v. Paul Jacoby Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that the phrase “extreme physical pain” as used in the statute is not unconstitutionally vague since it “describes a condition which most people of common intelligence can understand.”
State v. Broussard 33 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that the phrase “extreme physical pain” as used in the statute is not unconstitutionally vague since it “describes a condition which most people of common intelligence can understand.”
State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
-652 (La.1984); -1167 (La.1981), dissent at ; cert.
State v. Harris 966 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Although the term "extreme physical pain" is not defined by statute, the Supreme Court stated that the term describes a condition which most people of common intelligence can understand.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
-652 (La.1984); -1167 (La.1981), dissent at ; cert.
State v. Landry 871 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
State v. Blackson 865 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Lambert, 98-0703 (La.App.
State v. Helou 857 So. 2d 1024 La. 2003
State v. Saltzman 843 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Article 1, § 13 uses the word “detained” rather than the word “custody.” the supreme court discussed certain factors relevant in determining whether a person has been “detained” for purposes of Miranda : The determination of whether the detention is significant is to be made objectively from the totality of the circumstances ....
State v. Harris 842 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Legendre, 522 So.2d at 1250 ().
State v. Rasheed 841 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Jackson 838 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Gustavis 788 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
97-0020 at p. 3, 707 So.2d at 67
State v. Lambert 749 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Buffington 731 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
97-0020 at p. 3, 707 So.2d at 67
State v. Dillon 719 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
|14 Dissenting Opinion, Officer Hughes was approached by a complainant alleging that he was a victim of a battery committed by several persons.
State v. Pomeroy 713 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Hammond 706 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
(Louisiana state courts apply four factor test.)
State v. Alford 694 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Smith 686 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Hernandez 686 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Legendre, 522 So.2d at 1251 ().
State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Kimbrough 673 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Stowe 635 So. 2d 168 La. 1994
State v. DeCuir 599 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
the court held that the determination of whether a detention is significant must be made objectively from the totality of the circumstances.
State v. Perkins 540 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Watkins 526 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Legendre 522 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Sheehan 515 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Accardo 466 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
the Supreme Court on writ application addressed the issue of extreme pain.
State v. Patterson 464 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
” While in custody at the Kenner Police Department, the defendant made additional statements which were admitted into evidence.
State v. Broaden 461 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The factors to be considered when determining whether a : Factors relevant to the determination include (1) whether the police officer had reasonable cause under C.Cr.P.
State v. Thomas 460 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated factors relevant to this determination.
State v. Carlisle 458 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 452 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Moran 451 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984