Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Campbell, 660 So. 2d 7.
-
Olander v. Schillilaegh's
899 So. 2d 97
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Nancy A. Olander v. Schillileagh's
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95)
-
Metoyer v. Roy O. Martin, Inc.
895 So. 2d 552
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
[3] 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
- Kim Bigge v. the Lemoine Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Bigge v. the Lemoine Co.
896 So. 2d 269
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
- Brenda Jeanise v. Tommy Cannon D/B/A Rental World, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Jeanise v. Cannon
895 So. 2d 651
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
- Linda Faye Whaley v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Whaley v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp.
893 So. 2d 915
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc.
892 So. 2d 7
La. 2005
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Young v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center
898 So. 2d 428
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., 94-2708 & 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Wilkes v. Ivan Smith Furniture Co.
890 So. 2d 780
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Joseph v. Onyx Industrial Services
892 So. 2d 36
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/9/95), .
- Pamela Metoyer v. Roy O. Martin, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Richard Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
9/5/95), which provides: Section 1208 is clear and unambiguous and as such will be applied as written.
-
Sterling v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.
886 So. 2d 1270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Asplundh brings to our attention the case of Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, *1274 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), , which provides: Section 1208 is clear and unambiguous and as such will be applied as written.
-
Ravy v. Bridge Terminal Transport
883 So. 2d 1139
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
- Eugene Wells v. Dunham Price, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Wells v. Dunham Price, Inc.
883 So. 2d 495
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Brown v. International Paper Co.
882 So. 2d 1228
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
23:1208 A; Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/04), .
-
Rodriguez v. City of New Orleans
883 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), , the Supreme Court held that amendments to La.
-
Ronald Lanclos v. Coastal Food, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
[Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), ]
-
Lanclos v. Coastal Food, LLC.
877 So. 2d 309
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
[Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .]
-
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc.
878 So. 2d 595
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., 94-2708, 94-2708 p. 3 (La.9/5/95), , the Supreme Court made it clear that the general rule applies when the court is deciding fundamental matters such as what constitutes an "accident" or what injuries are compensable.
-
Taylor v. Tommie's Gaming
878 So. 2d 853
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Morton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 36,398 (La.App.2d Cir.10/25/02), , writ denied, 02-2814 (La.2/7/03), , citing Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ; and Smalley v. Integrity, Inc., 31,247 (La.App.2d Cir.12/9/98), , writ denied, 99-0072 (La.3/19/99), .
-
Martinez v. Boh Bros. Construction
879 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Tyler v. Nifty Fifties Cafe'
886 So. 2d 504
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
d against plaintiff, denying that [the claimant] had a work related [sic] accident basing [the] decision on allegations and not on any concrete or medical records.” After a thorough review of the record, we find that the OWC’s sound and well-written reasons for judgment, which we adopt and attach hereto as Appendix “A,” citing Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), (recently affirmed by St.
-
Leonard v. James Indus. Constructors
879 So. 2d 724
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
The court then restated its holding in Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), that the forfeiture penalty of La.
-
Risk Management Services v. Ashley
873 So. 2d 942
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ; Gilcrease v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 36,523 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), .
- Samuel Chesne v. Elevated Tank Applicators, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Chesne v. Elevated Tank Applicators, Inc. 874 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Newson v. Richard Spurgeon Masonry
867 So. 2d 78
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 7(La.9/5/95), .
- Walter Newson v. Richard Spurgeon Masonry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Teilla L. Noel v. Home Health Care 2000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
-
Floyd Boone, Jr. v. Mid-State Marketing
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
9/5/95), there must be a false statement or statements willfully made for the purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits.
-
Noel v. Home Health Care 2000, Inc.
867 So. 2d 945
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Boone v. Mid-State Marketing
867 So. 2d 91
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), , there must be a false statement or statements willfully made for the purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefits.
-
Gibbs v. Delasandro Painting and Decorating
868 So. 2d 804
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/05/95), .
-
Davis v. AMS Tube Corp.
868 So. 2d 141
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
[3] The WCJ cites Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), , for the elements required to find forfeiture of benefits under LSA-R.S.
- Lutherine B. Ashworth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
Apeck Construction, Inc. v. Foster M. Bowers
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
9/5/95), holding that it: “applies to any false statement or misrepresentation .
-
Apeck Const., Inc. v. Bowers
862 So. 2d 1087
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., 94-2708, p. 1 (La.9/5/95), , holding that it: "applies to any false statement or misrepresentation ...
-
Ashworth v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
861 So. 2d 753
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Stephens v. Southern Sweeping Services
862 So. 2d 197
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Rita Bergeron v. Cajun Kwik Mart, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95)
- Shannon Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Anthony J. Authement La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
-
Douglas v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co.
858 So. 2d 830
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
-
Bergeron v. Cajun Kwik Mart, Inc.
858 So. 2d 748
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), .
-
Blane Devillier Trucking, Inc. v. Authement
858 So. 2d 795
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .