DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Campbell, 660 So. 2d 7.

391 citing documents.

  • Nabors Drilling USA v. Davis 857 So. 2d 407 La. 2003
    Id., citing Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Stiner v. Antoni's Italian Café 857 So. 2d 400 La. 2003
    In Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), , this court considered the legislative history and intent of the anti-fraud provisions of the Louisiana Workers’ Compensation Act.
  • Guidry v. Brewer 857 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    23:1208 penalties must be triggered pursuant to the ruling in Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Ambeau v. Cajun Constructors, Inc. 855 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 2 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Newman v. Richard Price Const. 859 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Alphonso v. Bridge Terminal Transport 852 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), .
  • Rowan Companies, Inc. v. Powell 858 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Chauvin v. SOUTHERN TECHNOLOGY & SERVICES 858 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1 Cir. 6/28/96), (quoting Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), ).
  • Diggs v. SWDI, L.L.C. 858 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), ; see also Varnado v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., 98-0301 (La.App.
  • Pauley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 847 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Belaire v. Don Shetler Olds Buick Chevrolet 847 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    *728 In Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), , the supreme court noted that in order to forfeit benefits, La.R.S.
  • Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Frantz 847 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), , the supreme court set forth a three-part test for finding a forfeiture of benefits under La.R.S.
  • Teano v. Electrical Const. Co. 849 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708, p. 8 (La.9/5/95), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the "legislature has determined workers' compensation fraud is a severe and growing problem and has continually amended Section 1208 to make it easier to enforce and to make the penalties stiffer."
  • Weingartner v. Louisiana IceGators 854 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95); .
  • Issa v. LL & G CONST., INC. 844 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), , citing LSA-C.C.
  • Hurst v. Railserve, Inc. 844 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    1 Cir. 5/11/01), , writ denied, 2001-2291 (La.11/16/01), , citing Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138, pp. 1-2, 7 (La.9/5/95), 12 .
  • Western Sizzlin Steakhouse v. McDuffie 844 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 1 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Howard v. Holyfield Const., Inc. 839 So. 2d 1277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), .
  • Flintroy v. Scott Cummins Salvage 839 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), .
  • Alexis v. Alton Ochsner Foundation Hospital 869 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    LAW AND ANALYSIS As stated by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), , the purpose of La.
  • Lowe's Companies, Inc. v. LeBlanc 839 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Darby v. Gilbert Richard, Inc. 838 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95); , the supreme court provided a clear test for the application of La.R.S.
  • Thomas v. De St. James 846 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    (¡The Louisiana Supreme Court in Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95); , 12 interpreted and applied the provisions of La.R.S.
  • Hills v. Cypress Bayou Casino & Royal 843 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    23:1208 and the supreme court’s analysis in Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95); , neither the testimony of the co-employee observing Hills’ dancing at a local bar nor a videotape depicting Hills’ walking without apparent injury rises to the level of fraudulent conduct as required in the statute and in Resweber .
  • Godeaux v. Lewis Chapman Construction Co. 836 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Appellants argued that the testimony goes to credibility and cited to Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), , stating that any false statements made during the course of a workers’ compensation claim can disqualify plaintiff from receiving any further compensation.
  • Mallory v. Pineapple Management Services, Inc. 837 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Followed Williams v. Jefferson Parish School Board 836 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Colonial Nursing Home v. Bradford 834 So. 2d 1262 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Palmer v. Schooner Petroleum Services 834 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95); , there must be a false statement or statements willfully made for the purpose of obtaining workers' compensation benefits.
  • Dulin v. Levis Mitsubishi, Inc. 836 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Merit Constructors, *346 Inc., 707 So.2d at 1217-1218 ; Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), ; Boh Bros. Construction Co. v. Price, 800 So.2d at 905 .
  • Fish v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 833 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Gilcrease v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 843 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), ; Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. Gray, 34,731 (La.App.2d Cir.05/09/01), .
  • Bolton v. Mike Fleming Const. 833 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ; Figueroa v. Hardtner Medical Center, supra .
  • Murphy v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 832 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
  • St. Bernard Parish Police Jury v. Duplessis 831 So. 2d 955 La. 2002
    In Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), , this court considered whether a claimant, who made false statements regarding a previous injury, forfeited his rights to workers' compensation benefits under LSA-R.S.
  • Fontenot v. Shelton 834 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-C-2708, 94-C-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Duhon v. Albertson's, Inc. 829 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Morton v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 830 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.09/05/95), ; Smalley v. Integrity, Inc., 31,247 (La.App.2d Cir.12/09/98), , writ denied, 99-0072 (La.03/19/99), .
  • White v. Jerry's Machine & Fabrication, Inc. 829 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Weston v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 835 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95)
  • Cox v. Roofing Supply, Inc. 825 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), ; Smith v. Riverwood Int'l, 35,727 (La.
  • Chapman v. JD's Trucking Co. 835 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708 (La.9/15/95), , the supreme court analyzed the legislative history of Section 1208 and stated: The history of Section 1208 indicates a clear legislative intent to prevent and discourage fraud in relation to workers’ compensation claims, and Section 1208 should not be subjected to a strained interpretation which would undercut that
  • Town of Clinton v. Loyell 822 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 7 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Bibbins v. Sonny's Pizza, Inc. 822 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138, pp. 1-2 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Bossier Elec. v. Cubley 821 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Wallace v. Lavergne Transport 819 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95); .
  • Blair v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 818 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Co., 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 1 (La.9/5/95), .
  • City of Eunice v. Carrier 821 So. 2d 3 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    [5] Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co., 94-2708, 94-3138 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Marler v. N. ORLEANS COUNCIL, BOY SCOUTS 815 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co., 94-2708 (La.9/5/95), .
  • Meyer v. Carr Stone & Tile Co. 813 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    Resweber v. Haroil Construction Company, 94-2708, 94-3138, p. 11 (La.9/5/95), .