DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lambert, 720 So. 2d 724.

239 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. J.F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State v. J.F. 927 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Boyance 924 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Parnell Poche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Paul Boyance La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State v. Poche 924 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Paul Junius Felix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Felix 918 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Marlon Alexander La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), has stated: When the issue of sufficiency of the evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the cr
  • State of Louisiana v. M.J.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime pro
  • State v. M.J.S. 916 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. MJS 916 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Alexander 916 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 9/30/98) , , has stated: When the issue of sufficiency of the evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable
  • State of Louisiana v. Kelvin Rubin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 09/30/98), at 726-27, this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elemen
  • State v. Rubin 899 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 09/30/98), at 726-27 , this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a
  • State of Louisiana v. Wilbert Touchet, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime prov
  • State v. Touchet 897 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Carey Louis Hood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Hood 895 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Samuel Glenn Teague La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Teague 893 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
  • State of Louisiana v. Todd Durio La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), in which we disallowed for enhancement the first of two predicate offenses in which the defendant was apparently never represented by counsel.
  • State v. Durio 878 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    3 Cir. 9/30/98) , , in which we disallowed for enhancement the first of two predicate offenses in which the defendant was apparently never represented by counsel.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Edward Blake La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State v. Blake 872 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Glenn Jones A/K/A Ernest Hancock La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements
  • State v. Jones 855 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a re
  • State v. Taves 846 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98); -727 , this court explained: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyon
  • State v. Schexnaider 852 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 9/30/98) , , this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable
  • State v. Dauzat 843 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 9/30/98); -27 , this court stated as follows: |3When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime pro
  • State v. Shepherd 839 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a re
  • State v. Reed 809 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 9/30/98); -27 , wherein this court stated: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven b
  • State v. Barr 806 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , where we held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reas
  • State v. Kology 785 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    3 Cir. 9/30/98); , 726 this court recognized: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a
  • State v. Schoening 807 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98); , 726 this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reason
  • State v. McCullough 774 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 9/30/98) ; -727 .
  • State v. Callegari 773 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 9/30/98); , 727: It is the role of the fact finder to weigh the respective credibility of the witness.
  • State v. Foshee 756 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    3 Cir. 9/30/98); -727 , citing Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dixon 732 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999