DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lambert, 720 So. 2d 724.

239 citing documents.

  • State v. Bourque 33 So. 3d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. Thurman 18 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 9/30/98) , , wherein the defendant asserted that he started drinking after the accident.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jake M. Thurman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), wherein the defendant asserted that he started 8 drinking after the accident.
  • State of Louisiana v. Connor L. Wood La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Wood 11 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State v. Vice 997 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Billy Ray Vice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. E. J. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. EJF 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. E.J.F. 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Lee 996 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the es
  • State of Louisiana v. Scott Lee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Tassin 997 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State in the Interest of D.J. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State ex rel. D.J. 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State Ex Rel. Dj 995 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have fo
  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Herbert Lee Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State v. Prejean 981 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State v. Ware 980 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Ware La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State of Louisiana v. Clarence Walker Nelson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State v. Nelson 977 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy J. Ryan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Ryan 969 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Eric Harrison La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Jaramillo 953 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Jaramillo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State of Louisiana v. Willard Brandenburg La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Roland A. Authement, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could
  • State v. Brandenburg 949 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Authement 950 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mitchell Pat Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements
  • State v. Mayeux 949 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , this court held: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a re
  • State of Louisiana v. Warren Todd Dossman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Sean A. Strange La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found
  • State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, stated: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the cr
  • State of Louisiana v. Kendall Milton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27, a panel of this court explained: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found th
  • State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , stated: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable
  • State v. Dossman 940 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Milton 939 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    App. 3 Cir. 9/30/98), -27 , a panel of this court explained: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime pr
  • State v. Strange 940 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 9/30/98), , 726-27: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • State of Louisiana v. Dallas D. Durgan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Durgan 931 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Bordelon 929 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006