Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Robinson v. Heard, 809 So. 2d 943.

66 citing documents.

Varile Rae Ann Pitre Tucker v. Cecilia Chatfield and Homesite Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
Daxtreme, Inc. v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Salathe v. Parish of Jefferson 262 So. 3d 429 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Patrick Cummins v. R.A.H. Homes, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Robinson v. Heard, 01– 1697, pp. 3–4 (La.2/26/02)
Sarah Barber and Jamie Turner, Indiv. and O/B/O of Their Minor Children v. Louisiana Municipal Risk Management Agency … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Barber v. La. Mun. Risk Mgmt. Agency Grp. Self-Insured Fund 236 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/26/02), , 945 : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria *695 that govern the district court's consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Anthony J. Beslin v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
2/26/02), the supreme court set forth the applicable standard of appellate review in summary judgments involving insurance contracts: A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is approp
Beslin v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. 175 So. 3d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
|,s Waiver of Subrogation In Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), , the supreme court set forth the applicable standard of appellate review in summary judgments involving insurance contracts: A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under thé same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of- whether summary judg'ment is appropriate.
Williams v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance Co. 186 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Co. of La., 40,096 (La.App.2d Cir.9/28/05), -404 , unit denied, 05-2462 (La.3/24/06), , citing Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697 (La.2/26/02), ; Harrison v. Morrison & Son, Inc., 37,992 (La.App.2d Cir.12/10/03), *100 , writ denied, 04-101 (La.3/19/04),.
Rhonda B. Hickey v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), Peterson, 98-1712 at 5, 729 So.2d at 1029.
Hickey v. Allstate Ins. Co. 159 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), ; Peterson [v. Schimek ], 98-1712 at 5 [ (La.3//22/99).], 729 So.2d [1024] at 1029.
Nielson v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 167 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Robinson v. Heard, 2001-1697 (La.2/26/02), .
Christine Trumps v. U. S. Agencies Casualty Ins. Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Trumps v. Usagencies Casualty Insurance Co. 139 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir. 4/6/11), (quoting Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), ).
Mitchell Lemaire v. John Frank Blanchard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Davis v. Scottsdale Insurance Co. 128 So. 3d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), .
Aron's Pharmacy v. Bartlett 105 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Robinson v. Heard, 2001-1697 (La.2/26/02), ; Tedeton v. Tedeton, 46,901 (La.App.2d Cir.2/8/12), .
Calcasieu Parish School Board v. Mary Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), Peterson, 98-1712 at 5, 729 So.2d at 1029.
Jimmie W. Belgard v. Manchac Technologies, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court‟s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
David Goodwyn v. Pivod Technologies, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Calcasieu Parish School Board v. Miller 92 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), ; Peterson , 98-1712 at 5, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
Belgard v. Manchac Technologies, LLC 92 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard applicable to appellate review of summary judgments in Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), , 945: A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Tedeton v. Tedeton 87 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697 (La.2/26/02), .
Paul D. Moreau, Et Ux. v. Mary Morgan McKenzie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Moreau v. McKenzie 74 So. 3d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard applicable to appellate review of summary judgments in Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), , 945: A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Kottenbrook v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 69 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697 (La.2/26/02), .
Ann Newman v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Innovative Hospitality Systems, LLC v. Johnny Abraham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Newman v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. 62 So. 3d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the standard applicable to appellate review of summary judgments involving insurance contracts in Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), , 945: A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the.
Haddad v. Elkhateeb 46 So. 3d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), -946 .
Buffman Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 36 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Robinson v. Heard, XXXX-XXXX, p. 4 (La.2/26/02) ; see also La.
Andre Alexander v. the Estate of Maurice D. McNeal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Althea Dupar v. the Estate of Maurice D. McNeal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2/26/02), : A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Alexander v. ESTATE OF McNEAL 33 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
*1034 Standard of Review The supreme court discussed the applicable standard of appellate review in summary judgments involving insurance contracts in Robinson v. Heard, 07-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), , 945: A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Eva L. Bankston v. Lsu Health Sciences Center, Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Bankston v. LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER 7 So. 3d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), .
Rideau v. Edwards 985 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
DISCUSSION Standard of Review The supreme court discussed the standard applicable to appellate review of summary judgments involving insurance contracts in Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), , 945: A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under the same criteria that govern the district court's consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate.
Floyd Rideau, Et Ux. v. Walter J. Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2/26/02), : 23 A reviewing court examines summary judgments de novo under 24 the same criteria that govern the district court’s consideration of whether 25 summary judgment is appropriate.
McGuire v. American Southern Home Ins. Co. 969 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), .
Henry v. South Louisiana Sugars Co-Op. 957 So. 2d 1275 La. 2007
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), .
Huggins v. Gerry Lane Enterprises, Inc. 957 So. 2d 127 La. 2007
Robinson v. *129 Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), .
Sims v. Mulhearn Funeral Home, Inc. 956 So. 2d 583 La. 2007
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), ; Peterson , 98-1712 at 5, 729 So.2d at 1029 .
Walker Ex Rel. Walker v. State Farm Mutual 954 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
*851 Robinson v. Heard, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/26/02), .
Armenia Coffee v. American Nat. Fire Ins. 946 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
See, e.g., Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), .
Irving Ceasar v. Sheriff Sid Hebert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
2 “Interpretation of an insurance contract is usually a legal question that can be properly resolved in the framework of a motion for summary judgment.” Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02)
Ceasar v. Hebert 941 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), .
Henry v. SOUTH LOUISIANA SUGARS CO-OP. 940 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), .
Bonin v. Westport Ins. Corp. 930 So. 2d 906 La. 2006
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, pp. 3-4 (La.2/26/02), .
LaFleur v. Aftco Enterprises, Inc. 927 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Robinson v. Heard, 01-1697, p. 4 (La.2/26/02), .
Wanda Lafleur, Indiv. v. Aftco Enterprises, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006