Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 838 So. 2d 729.

131 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Cortney Fitzgerald La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Zamir K. Massey La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
1/14/03), State v. Coleman, 52,074 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Davieontray Lee Breaux La. 2025
State Of Louisiana v. Daniel Martinez La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Yery Gabriel Ramirez-Delgado La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
1/14/03), State v. Seals, 09-1089 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Patrick J. Callegan La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Lamonte Loggins La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Williams La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Kessler King La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Kanethra Burnett La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
1/14/03), -746; State v. Robinson, 2009-1137, pp. 7-8 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Viusqui J. Perez-Espinosa La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. John Jacob Jenkins La. 2024
1/14/03), (rule of “narrative completeness” permits the use of evidence “to tell a story of guiltiness [and] to support an inference of guilt, to convince the jurors a guilty verdict would be mo rally reasonable as much as to point to the discrete elements of a defendant’s legal fault.” (citing Old Chief v. United Stat
State of Louisiana Versus Jerman Neveaux La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. John Jacob Jenkins La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Donald Franklin La. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Ryk Frickey La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
1/14/03), -45; see also Falkins, 146 So.3d at 851-52.
State of Louisiana v. Jason Ray Craft La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Sharrieff M. Kent La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Kerry Alexander La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Falgout La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. James Bourgeois La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Adam Littleton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana Versus Steven Rodney La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Marcus Dwayne Piper A/K/A Marcus Piper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Piper 269 So. 3d 952 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Russell Wade Cole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See State v. Taylor, 01–1638 (La.1/14/03), cert.
State v. Cole 265 So. 3d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Garcie 242 So. 3d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell D. McElroy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. McElroy 241 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1/14/03), , 741-42, cert.
State v. Brown 235 So. 3d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Maize 223 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Gross 218 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Kinard 214 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/14/03), , wherein the Court recognized that “[wjhen a defendant exercises his privilege against self-incrimination the validity of any subsequent waiver depends upon whether police have “scrupulously honored” his right to remain silent.” (citing Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 102 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Barthelemy 216 So. 3d 809 La. 2017
State v. Joseph 208 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Copelin 206 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. William Chester Farry Jr. AKA William Chester Farry AKA William C. Farry AKA William … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
12/10/10), this court explained admissibility of other crimes evidence, writing in pertinent part: The Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the admissibility of other crime [sic] evidence when it relates to conduct formerly known as res gestae in State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-12 (La.1/14/03), -43, cert.
State v. Farry 206 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
1/14/03), (“The defense conceded defendant’s guilt, but argued the crime more properly fit second degree murder.”); State v. Frost, 97-1771 (La.
State v. Kirsh 273 So. 3d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/14/03), , 741-742, cert.
State v. Gautier 197 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lambert 186 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 10-11 (La.1/14/03), , quoting Colomb , 98-2813, p. 3, 747 So.2d at 1076 , explained res gestae: Res gestae events constituting other crimes are deemed admissible because they are so nearly connected to the charged offense that the state could not accurately present its case without reference to them.
State v. Johnson 182 So. 3d 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03); , cert.
State v. Scott 184 So. 3d 2 La. 2015
In its initial response to defendant's motion in limine, the state cited State v. Taylor, 01-1638 (La.1/14/03), , for the broad proposition that “[tlhe defendant’s actions following the commission of the murder are admissible under res gestae."
State v. Carter 171 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Taylor, 01-1638, p. 10 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State of Louisiana v. Jamarlon Pierre La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
State v. Pierre 170 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
■ The trial court ruled that the statement was “a part of the res gestae of the event or the occurrence.” |9In State v. Taylor, 01-1638, pp. 12-13 (La.1/14/03), , cert.
State v. Taylor 165 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Taylor, 2001-1638, p. 6 (La.1/14/03), , citing Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 102 , 96 S.Ct.