Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Payne, 833 So. 2d 927.

51 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Devion D Taylor La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
Ronald Davis v. Tube-Tech Services, Inc. & American Liberty Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
The Louisiana Supreme Court has stated, “[T]he legal findings of the trial court are subject to review without the great deference standard we attach to 2 credibility determinations.” State v. Payne, 01–3196, p. 6 (La.12/4/02)
State of Louisiana v. Matt Mason, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Pernell D. Smith La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Jermon James La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
12/4/02), State v. Howell, 55,070 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jaleel Green La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jayden M. Boyd La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Leonard Patty La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
12/4/02), (citing Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 484-485,101 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Timothy C. Howell La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Scot Martin Kidd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Orlando Brown La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana Versus Teddy Chester La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher James Landry La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Raymond George Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
In re State 240 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Anderson -Aka- Samuel Brent Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Anderson 258 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Payne, 01- 3196 (La.12/4/02), Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. at 469-473, 86 S.Ct.
State v. Broussard 224 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
12/4/02), ; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. at 469-473 , 86 S.Ct.
In re the Succession of Biscamp 211 So. 3d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State ex rel. T.W. 175 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
at 1612 ; State v. Payne, 01-3196 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Workman 170 So. 3d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Payne, 01-3196, p. 7 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Williams 144 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held that a suspect subject to custodial interrogation has the right to consult with an attorney and to have counsel present during questioning, and that the police must explain this right to him before questioning begins.” State v. Payne, 01-3196, p. 7 (La.12/4/02), (citing Miranda, 384 U.S. at 469-473, 86 S.Ct.
State v. Hankton 140 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
As the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized in State v. Payne, 01-3196, p. 9 (La.12/4/02), , “[t]he Miranda right to counsel is a prophylactic rule that does not operate independent from the danger it seeks to protect against, i.e., the compelling atmosphere inherent in the process of in-custody interrogation, and the effect that danger can have on a suspect’s privilege to avoid compelled self-incrimin
State ex rel. S.L. 94 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
at 1612 ; State v. Payne, 01-3196 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Gill 30 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Malcolm James Simon AKA Malcolm Simon AKA Malcolm J. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Payne, 01-3196, pp. 9-10 (La.12/4/02)
State v. Shirley 10 So. 3d 224 La. 2009
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); State v. Payne, 2001-3196 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Lowe 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
12/4/02), , wherein a suspect asked a detective "may I call a lawyer-can I call a lawyer?"
State of Louisiana v. Damon Broeske Frye La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Frye 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Mollette 2 So. 3d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Payne, 01-3196, p. 7 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Robertson 995 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Payne, 01-3196, p. 7 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Deen 953 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
In this right to remain silent case, we look for guidance to a recent right to counsel case from the Louisiana Supreme Court, State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/04/02), .
State v. Allen 955 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Payne, 01-3196 *748 (La.12/4/02), ; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. at 469-473 , 86 S.Ct.
State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Payne, 01-3196 (La.12/4/02), ; Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. at 469-473, 86 S.Ct.
State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
2350, 2355 , 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994); State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX p. 12 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Caston 912 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981); State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Butler 894 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
As to whether a Butler has invoked his right to an attorney, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated in State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), : The purpose of the Miranda-Edwards v. Arizona, [ 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
1602 ; State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Morris 882 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Weaver 873 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), , citing Edwards v. Arizona, supra, 451 U.S. at 485-486 , 101 S.Ct.
State v. Genter 872 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
In State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), , the defendant was arrested, and as she was standing outside the police car, an officer took a cell anphone from her hand.
Kevin Associates, LLC v. Crawford 865 So. 2d 34 La. 2004
See State v. Payne, 01-3196, p. 6 (La.12/4/02), ("[T]he legal findings of the trial court are subject to review without the great deference standard we attach to credibility determinations.").
State of Louisiana v. Brian Keith Poullard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Peterson 868 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX, p. 6 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Poullard 863 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Payne, 01-3196, p. 14 (La.12/4/02), .
State v. Howard 855 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
See State v. Payne, XXXX-XXXX (La.12/4/02), ; State v. Williams, 36,456 (La.App.2d Cir.10/4/02), .
State of Louisiana v. John R. Chesson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Chesson 856 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Jurisprudence regarding the right to counsel in custodial situations was reviewed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State v. Payne, 01-3196 (La.12/4/02), .