Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Champagne v. Ward, 893 So. 2d 773.

196 citing documents.

National Collegiate Student Loans Trust 2005-1 v. Kristen Pleasant Patsy Brown La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
1/19/05), Bagwell, supra; In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the court must assume that all affiants are credible.
Crochet Equipment Company, Inc. v. Lincoln Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
1/19/05), Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling Am.
Gonzalo Juarez v. Anthony Turner; Go Auto Insurance; Embark General Insurance Adjusters LLC; And Redpoint County Mutual Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
Jacob Kibodeaux v. Jan's Construction Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211, p. 5 (La.1/19/05)
Paulette McKnight v. Alondra Villareal, and Redpoint County Mutual Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
1119105), we must first determine whether there is a difference between Louisiana' s law and the law of the foreign state.
Timothy D. Koehl Versus Rli Insurance Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Packard Truck Lines, L.L.C., and Robert T. … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
April Tucker Versus Reginald Thornton, Thornton's Cab Service, Geico General Insurance Company, and Atlas Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Charles E. Barker Versus Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Karen Yessenia Orellana Henriquez and Jose Henriquez Teruel Jaas Versus MacY's Retail Holdings, Inc. and MacY's Corporate Services, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
1/19/05), Robinson v. Jefferson Parish Sch.
Anthony Hernandez and Rebecca Eades, individually and on behalf of decedent Camron Hernandez, and Colton Hawkins v. Aethon … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
1/19/05), Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling American Insurance Co., 52,177 (La.
Gregory Jones, Jr. v. the Boot Bar & Grill, C. Napco, Inc., Craig Napoli, Nancy Napoli, Aline Napoli, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Allen Varnado v. 201 St. Charles Place, LLC, Howe Green, Ltd., and Ff Systems, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Kelley D. Wyatt and Jeffrey L. Wyatt, Individually and on Behalf of Their Children, Jacob L. Wyatt and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
1/19/05), in which the Supreme Court held that, in deciding a case involving another state’s insurance contracts, Louisiana courts must (1) determine whether there is a difference between Louisiana insurance law and the other state’s insurance law, and (2) if there is a difference, apply the choice-of-law analysis codified
Cassie Angelle v. Lafayette Consolidated Government La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Robert James Lee Guidry v. Worknet 2000, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Safeway Insurance Company - Mississippi v. Eulanda Nash La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
1/ 19/ 05), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that Louisiana law does not automatically apply to UM claims under a policy issued in another state, even though a Louisiana resident 2 The record reflects that although there was proper notice and service, neither Ms. Nash nor her counsel appeared at the September 16, 2019 h
Rocco LaTorre v. Lucas Cade Hunter, Enterprise Rent A Car and Mercury Indemnity Company of America La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
1/ 19/ 05), which, like the case herein, involved an accident that occurred in Louisiana causing injury to a resident of another state who was driving a vehicle covered by an insurance policy negotiated and issued in that other state, where we determine that there is a difference between Louisiana' s UM law
Douglas Bagwell v. Quality Easel Company, Inc., and James E. Dugdale, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
1/19/05), Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling Am.
Ross and Wallace Paper Products, Inc. v. Team Logistics, Inc. and Pittsburgh Logistics, Inc. d/b/a PLS Logistics Services La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Robert Lagneaux v. Galloway Jefcoat, LLP La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Brandy Barker Versus City of Grand Isle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Jefferson Parish Sch. Bd. v. Timbrian LLC 273 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
Saldana v. Larue Trucking, LLC 268 So. 3d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
1/19/05), ; Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling Am.
Edgefield v. Audubon Nature Inst., Inc. 267 So. 3d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Jones v. Fin. Indem. Co. 264 So. 3d 660 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
1/19/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that the appropriate starting point in a multistate case is to determine if there is a difference between Louisiana's law and the law of the foreign state.
Bloxham v. HDI-Gerling Am. Ins. Co. 251 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Shephard v. AIX Energy, Inc. 249 So. 3d 194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Jacobs v. Oath for Louisiana, Inc. 221 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Larry Kebodeaux v. Nabors Drilling, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
1/19/05), (citation omitted).
Kebodeaux v. Nabors Drilling, LP 213 So. 3d 1294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1/19/05), (citation omitted).
Garces-Rodriguez v. Geico Indemnity Co. 209 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/19/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that Louisiana’s UM statute is applicable to policies “delivered or issued for delivery in this state” and held that Louisiana law does not automatically apply to the interpretation of a foreign UM insurance policy in a multi-state case where an accident occurs in Louisiana and
Contreras v. Vesper 214 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/19/05); , the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed the issue of choice-of-law for insurance contracts issued in a foreign jurisdiction.
Oswalda Rangel, Indiv. v. Felipe Vega-Ortz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
1/19/05), that the provision is not necessarily applicable to a foreign insurance policy in a multistate case, even though the accident occurs in Louisiana and involves a Louisiana resident.
Rangel v. Vega-Ortiz 200 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1/19/05), , that the provision is not necessarily applicable to a foreign insurance policy in a multistate case, even though the accident occurs in Louisiana and involves a Louisiana resident.
Heath v. Continental Casualty Co. 200 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Champagne v. Ward, 2003-3211 (La.1/19/05), .
Jones v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 183 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Champagne v. Ward, 2003-3211 (La.1/19/05), -777 .
J-W Operating Co. v. Olsen 167 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211 (La.1/19/05), .
Davis v. Elmer 166 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Scott v. Dillard's, Inc. 169 So. 3d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Law and Argument Standard of Review 1 On appeal, our review of summary judgments is de novo, using “the same criteria that govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary judgment is appropriate, i.e., whether there is a genuine issue of material fact and whether the | ¿mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211 (La.1/19/05), ; Robinson v. Jefferson Parish Sch.
Alphonse J. Credeur v. Richard Dickie" Latiolais, in His Capacity as Secretary- Treasurer for the Acadia Parish Police … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
A ‘material fact’ is a fact, the existence or non-existence of which may be essential to a cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.” Hogg, 45 So.3d at 997 (citations omitted), citing Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211 (La.1/19/05)
Credeur v. Latiolais 158 So. 3d 248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
A ‘material fact’ is a fact, the existence or non-existence of which may be essential to a cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.” Hogg, 45 So.3d at 997 (citations omitted), citing Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211 (La.1/19/05), .
Vivint Louisiana, LLC v. State 169 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Champagne v. Ward, 2003-3211 (La.1/19/05), .
Rios v. Pierce 158 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Parker v. Safeway Insurance Co. 152 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See also Champagne v. Ward, 2003-3211 (La.1/19/05), .
Caceres v. United Automobile Insurance Co. 154 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211, p. 27 (La.1/19/05), .
Prime Insurance Co. v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211, p. 5 (La.1/19/05), .
Southern Acadiana Services, LLC v. Phonesaga Phyarath La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Southern Acadiana Services, LLC v. Phayarath 139 So. 3d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
A ‘material fact’-is a fact, the existence or non-existence of which may be essential to a cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.” Hogg, 45 So.3d at 997 (citations omitted), citing Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211 (La.1/19/05), .
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 146 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Champagne v. Ward, 2003-3211 (La.1/19/05), ; Wendling v. Chambliss, 2009-1422 (La.App.
Davis v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance 129 So. 3d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See also Champagne v. Ward, 03-3211, p. 4 (La.1/19/05), .