Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 845 So. 2d 1061.

721 citing documents.

  • State v. Moten 158 So. 3d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-0562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Maggio 157 So. 3d 1290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Frazier 157 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Zhegao Quan 157 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Henry 159 So. 3d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , this court stated: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the *1182 legislative purpose behind the punishment and a comparison of
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
  • State v. Thacker 157 So. 3d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” State v.
  • State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Warren Ray Gautreaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 1/14/03), writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Stephan M. Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. John Boyd Baham La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody R. Balach La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody R. Balach La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Gautreaux 153 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
  • State v. Balach 150 So. 3d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Balach 150 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Bergeron 150 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Castillo 167 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Waylon P. Sauls, II La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State v. Sauls 149 So. 3d 1005 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), 846.So.2d 786, 789, writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Reginald Terrence Ragland La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Duong 148 So. 3d 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Malcolm Jarman Rhodes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/30/03), this court noted: [A]n appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment and a comparison of the sentences imposed for similar crimes.
  • State of Louisiana v. Tony Jackson, AKA Leoanrdo Jackson, AKA Leon Jackson, AKA Leonardo Marice Jackson, AKA Leonard … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State v. Jackson 146 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Devin Delacerda La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Delacerda 140 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Adams 142 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Walter Urena La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Daye La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Lantibious A. Broussard AKA Lantipious A. Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/30/03), (citations omitted).
  • State v. Daye 139 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State v. Urena 161 So. 3d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell Dontrell Fort La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Bibbins 140 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    5 Cir. 1/14/03) , , writ denied, 03-0482 (La.5/30/03), , cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Wesley Billiot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Billiot 135 So. 3d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Davis Dwayne Freeman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Walker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Albert Meaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Millard Irby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03)
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: 3 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.
  • State of Louisiana v. Travis W. Nolen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Soileau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    5/30/03), a panel of this court observed that: While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Soileau 153 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: *1006 While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State v. Soileau 153 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , a panel of this court observed that: 14While a comparison of sentences imposed for similar crimes may provide some insight, “it is well settled that sentences must be individualized to the particular offender and to the particular offense committed.” (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Therand Guy Thacker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Justin Robert Sizemore La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    5/30/03), stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment
  • State v. Sizemore 129 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir. 2/12/03), , writ denied, 03-562 (La.5/30/03), , stating: In deciding whether a sentence is shocking or makes no meaningful contribution to acceptable penal goals, an appellate court may consider several factors including the nature of the offense, the circumstances of the offender, the legislative purpose behind the punishment and a comparison of the sentences im