Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Campbell, 877 So. 2d 112.

59 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Clay Landis Riggs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Randle James Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Clay Landis Riggs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Brittany Nicole Howe, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of Grayson Konrad, a Minor v. Samantha Gafford and the … La. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Clay Landis Riggs La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Jose M. Sagastume La. 2023
Amy Wederstrandt and Billy R. Efferson, Jr. v. Eden Kol La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Laureen Olson v. Louisiana Patient's Compensation Fund Oversight Board; Kenneth Schnauder and Kurt Loup La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Ronnie Griffith v. CMR Construction & Maintenance Resources and LCTA Workers' Compensation La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
James B. Cantrelle, in his official capacity as the President of the Parish of Lafourche v. The Lafourche … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. Terry Vince La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Sylvia Hawthorne v. Norfolk Southern Corporation D/B/A Norfolk Southern Railway; Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans; Boh … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Johnson, 884 So.2d at 576; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04)
State Of Louisiana v. Mingo Javery, III La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Louisiana State University System Board of Supervisors Through Louisiana State University Veterinarian Teaching Hospital v. Robert Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
7/6/04), (internal citations omitted).
State Of Louisiana v. Marlon D. Harwell La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Jan Alfred Langston v. Dr. Syed Fazal-Ur-Rehman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
This Court has held that “It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that when two statutes deal with the same subject matter, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 8 (La.7/6/04)
Woodrow Wilson Constr., LLC v. Amtek of La., Inc. 256 So. 3d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Woodrow Wilson Constr. LLC v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd. 245 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/6/04), , 118 (citing Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.
State of Louisiana v. the Louisiana Land and Exploration Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
[State v.] Johnson, [2003-2993 (La.10/19/04);] 884 So.2d [568] at 576; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04)
Jones v. Anderson 224 So. 3d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Ashaki Okung Kelly 195 So. 3d 449 La. 2016
State v. Gibson 192 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
art. 882 A (“An illegal sentence may be corrected at any time by the court that imposed the sentence or by an appellate court on review.”); State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 5 (La.7/6/04), .
Brindisi v. Board of Trustees 170 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Toomy, 63 So.3d at 202 ; citing State v. Campbell, 2003-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Mead 165 So. 3d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
art. 882 A (“An illegal sentence may be corrected at any time by the court that imposed the sentence or by an appellate court on review.”); State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 5 (La.7/6/04), .
In re Edward Wisner Donation 150 So. 3d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Johnson , 03-2993, p. 14, 884 So.2d at 576 ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 8 (La.7/6/04), .
State in the Interest of K. L. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Johnson, 884 So.2d at 576; State v. Campbell, 03–3035 (La.7/6/04)
State ex rel. K.L.A. 140 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Johnson, 884 So.2d at 576 ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Gregoire 143 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See State v. Campbell, 2003-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
Peck v. Richmar Construction, Inc. 144 So. 3d 1042 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Campbell, 2003-3035, p. 8 (La.7/6/04), .
Pignona v. Farber 128 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that when two statutes deal with the same subject matter, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” Burge v. State, 2010-2229, p. 5 (La.2/11/11), ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 8 (La.7/6/04), .
Roberson v. Roberson 122 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Campbell, 2003-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
Soileau v. Smith True Value & Rental 144 So. 3d 771 La. 2013
10/19/04), -77 ; and State v. Campbell, 2003-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
Westgate, LLC v. Eaton Corp. 113 So. 3d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Burge v. State, 10-2229 (La.2/11/11), ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. 110 So. 3d 1038 La. 2013
[State v.] Johnson, [2003-2993 (La.10/19/04);] 884 So.2d [568] at 576; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
Boudreaux v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 101 So. 3d 22 La. 2012
State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Guidera 111 So. 3d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Previously, in State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 10 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court held that a defendant convicted of third-offense DWI could not have his sentence enhanced under the Habitual Offender Law, even where he had two prior non-DWI felony convictions.
Boudreaux v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 80 So. 3d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Campbell, 2003-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
Gaylord Chemical Corporation v. Short 81 So. 3d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Shoupe 71 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
He alleges that because his conviction was already enhanced, the imposition of a habitual offender adjudication violated the Supreme Court’s holding in State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
State of Louisiana v. G. T., Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
7/6/04), in which the defendant was found guilty of DWI, third offense.
State v. GT, JR. 71 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In support of his argument, Defendant refers to State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), , in which the defendant was found guilty of DWI, third offense.
Burge v. State 54 So. 3d 1110 La. 2011
This Court has held that “It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that when two statutes deal with the same subject matter, if there is a conflict, the statute specifically directed to the matter at issue must prevail as an exception to the statute more general in character.” State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 8 (La.7/6/04), .
Tensas Poppadoc, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Johnson, 884 So.2d at 576; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04)
Tensas Poppadoc, Inc. v. Chevron USA, Inc. 10 So. 3d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Johnson, 884 So.2d at 576 ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
Johnson, 884 So.2d at 576 ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Gutweiler 979 So. 2d 469 La. 2008
Moss v. State, 05-1963, p. 15 (La.4/4/06), ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 7 (La.7/6/04)
State v. Coker 973 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Newton 973 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (La.7/6/04), .
FNB OF PICAYUNE v. Pearl River Fabricators 971 So. 2d 302 La. 2007
Johnson, 884 So.2d at 576 ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035 (La.7/6/04), .
State v. Dick 951 So. 2d 124 La. 2007
Johnson , 03-2993, p. 14, 884 So.2d at 576 ; State v. Campbell, 03-3035, p. 8 (La.7/6/04), .