Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 998 So. 2d 16.

194 citing documents.

Billeaudeau v. Opelousas Gen. Hosp. Auth. 239 So. 3d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
7/1/08), , 27, amended on reh'g (9/19/08).
State Ex Rel. John Esteen v. State of Louisiana 239 So. 3d 233 La. 2018
David Carver v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 239 So. 3d 226 La. 2018
The Sweet Lake Land and Oil Company v. Oleum Operating Company, L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
7/1/08), stated in dicta: “Finally, it is the district court who considers the various restoration plans, including any that the surface owner may choose to submit, determines which one is most feasible, and oversees the implementation of the restoration plan.
Philip Shelton v. Nancy Pavon 236 So. 3d 1233 La. 2017
Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co. v. Oleum Operating Co. 229 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
7/1/08), , stated in dicta; “Finally, it is the district court who considers the various restor ration plans, including any that the surface owner may choose to submit, determines which one is most feasible, and oversees the implementation of= the restoration plan.
State of Louisiana v. Kayla Brignac La. 2017
7/1/08), -27, amended on reh’g (La.
Bradley v. St. Francis Med. Ctr. 244 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
07/01/08), , 26 ; L.J.D.
Urquhart v. Spencer 224 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Parish of Ascension v. State 223 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
7/1/08), -27 , amended on reh’g (9/19/08) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted): The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.
Taxicab Insurance Store, LLC v. American Service Insurance Co. 224 So. 3d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Salemi v. TMR Exploration, Inc. 224 So. 3d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Hill v. TMR Exploration, Inc. 223 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Security Plan Fire Insurance Co. v. Donelon 220 So. 3d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District v. Guy Hopkins Construction Co. 220 So. 3d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co., LLC v. Oleum Operating Company, Lc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Shelton v. Pavon 212 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Thomas v. A. Wilbert & Sons, LLC 217 So. 3d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Radcliffe 10, L.L.C. v. Ronald G. Burger and Lynda O. Burger 219 So. 3d 296 La. 2017
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007–2371, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), citing State v. Johnson, 2003–2993, p. 12 (La.10/19/04)
Robert D. MAYEUX and Lisa M. Mayeux v. George J. CHARLET, Jr., Deceased, Charlet Funeral Home, Inc., Rev. … 203 So. 3d 1030 La. 2016
State v. Wells 203 So. 3d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
7/1/08), , amended on rehearing on other grounds, 07-2371 (La.
State, Department of Children & Family Services, Child Support Enforcement ex rel. K.J.W. v. D.J.P. 199 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Farms, *659 Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), .
Garrett v. K & B Machine Works, Inc. 194 So. 3d 1110 La. 2016
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 13 (La.7/1/08), .
In Re: Medical Review Panel Claim of Rose Tillman C/W in Re: The Medical Review Panel Claim of … La. 2016
In Re: Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Peighton Miller v. Tulane Lakeside Hospital 187 So. 3d 445 La. 2016
Sid-Mar's Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. State ex rel. Governor 182 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), -34 , the Supreme Court reiterated the framework of analysis courts must employ to determine whether laws are to be applied retroactively.
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 182 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 12 (La.7/1/08), (“Generally, when a trial court judgment is silent as to a claim or demand, it'is presumed the relief sought was denied.”); Plaquemines Parish then timely sought a devolutive appeal upon a designated record.
Darell Layne Cormier v. Tamatha Lynn Cormier, Born Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p.12(La.7/1/08)
Surcouf v. Darling 177 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007-2371 (La.7/1/08), (“the constitution is the supreme law of this state, to which all legislative acts must yield”).
Connick v. Shepherd 176 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 , (La.7/1/08), (“[T]he party challenging the validity of a statute has the burden of proving its unconstitutionality.”).
Kirby v. Poydras Center, LLC 176 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 12 (La.7/1/08), , for the proposition that "relief sought presumed denied when judgment si lent as to claim or demand.”); Seals v. Omni Bank Ins.
Rousset v. Smith 176 So. 3d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 12 (La.7/1/08), (“Generally, when a trial court judgment is silent as to a claim or demand, it is presumed the relief sought was denied.”).
O'Hara v. Globus Medical, Inc. 181 So. 3d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007-2371 (La.7/1/08), , amended on rehearing on other grounds, 2007-2371 (La.9/19/08), .
Draughn Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
7/1/08), -27, amended on reh’g (9/19/08)(citations omitted), the supreme court explained: The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.
Koonce v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 172 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, pp. 13-14 (La.7/1/08), -27 , amended on reh’g (9/19/08) (citations omitted), the supreme court explained: The function of statutory interpretation and the construction given to legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of the government.
R.T. Faulk, III, Corey Farms, L.L.C. Faulk Farms, Incorporated Joanne Hodges River Valley Properties McHenry Farms, L.L.C. Sherman … La. 2015
7/1/08), City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Assessors’ Retirement and Relief Fund, 05-2548 (La.
Yount v. Handshoe 171 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La.07/01/08), .
State ex rel. Orleans Parish Criminal District Court v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Landrieu 151 So. 3d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 14 (La.7/1/08), .
Morgan v. Glazers Wholesale Drug Co. 147 So. 3d 295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. 1 uExxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), .
Alfonso v. Cooper 146 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), , and noting that “[generally, when a judgment is silent as to a claim or demand, it is presumed that the relief sought was denied.") .
Janice Spikes v. Louisiana Commerce & Trade Association La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Spikes v. Louisiana Commerce & Trade Ass'n 161 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), .
State in the Interest of K. L. A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State ex rel. K.L.A. 140 So. 3d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, pp. 13-14 (La.7/1/08), .
Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 145 So. 3d 271 La. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 18 (La.7/1/08), , [n29; Manuel v. Louisiana Sheriffs Risk Management Fund; 95-0406, pp. 8-9 (La.11/27/95), ; Cole, 599 So.2d at 1063 ; St.
Hazel Richard Savoie v. Alice T. Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Savoie v. Richard 137 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371, p. 32 (La.7/1/08), .
Caldwell v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. 144 So. 3d 898 La. 2014
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 07-2371 (La.7/1/08), .
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. v. Wooden 132 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Farms Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2007-2371 (La.7/1/08), ; St.
Snider v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance 130 So. 3d 922 La. 2013
Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, 2007-2371 (La.7/1/08), -30 ), we find it unnecessary to reach the issue, as we decide the case on another basis, as expressed hereinafter.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by