Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 245 So. 2d 151.

446 citing documents.

Ngoc Troung v. Marcus Dewayne Sanders and Old American Indemnity Company La. 2025
Coleman, 326 So.2d at 347 ( So.2d 151 (1971).
Wanda Anderson v. Guzzino Commercial, LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
Co., [], 245 So.2d [151] at 155 [La.1971]; See Prosser, Torts, § 41, p. 269 (5th ed. 1984) (“Where the conclusion is not one within common knowledge, expert testimony may provide a sufficient basis for it, but in the absence of such testimony it may not be drawn.
Clarence Hamilton and Novelle Fleming Versus Progressive Waste Solutions of La, Inc. Xyz Insurance Company and John Doe La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Succession of Carolyn Gauthier Bargeman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Co., So.2d 151, 155 (1971); McCormick on Evidence § 339, at 421 (5th ed.1999).
Victor Bruno v. Brd US, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
So.2d 151 (1971); Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Company, 244 La.
Anthony James Landry v. Guzzino Commercial, LLC. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Co., [],245 So.2d [151] at 155 [La.1971]; See Prosser, Torts, § 41, p. 269 (5th ed. 1984) (“Where the conclusion is not one within common knowledge, expert testimony may provide a sufficient basis for it, but in the absence of such testimony it may not be drawn.
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
United States Aircraft Insurance Group v. Global Tower, LLC D/B/A Global Tower Partners La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Kent Jensen and Saeko Yatsuka Jensen, (Husband and Wife), for Their Own, and as Parents and Legal Guardians … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Co., -08, (1971) (observing that a tort victim has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the damages caused by the defendant's fault); (La.
Etienne v. C. Thompson Auto., Inc. 269 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Co. , , , 155 (La.1971).
Arthur Etienne, Jr. v. C. Thompson Automotive, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Schwarzenberger v. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans 226 So. 3d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2017
Mitchell v. Aaron's Rentals 218 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Tomlinson v. Landmark American Insurance Co. 192 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Groover v. Lafitte's Boudoir, Inc. 162 So. 3d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 Cir. 9/25/96) , , 1096, , -55 (1971).
Lawrence v. Government Employees Insurance Co. 151 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Guillot v. Doughty 142 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
155: ‘[P]roof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.’ Id.
Cece Sloan v. Renee Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Sloan v. Mouton 82 So. 3d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Arlene Chambers v. Village of Moreauville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Chambers v. Village of Moreauville 60 So. 3d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
White Haute, LLC v. Mayo 38 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bradley Griffith v. Resa Latiolais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Co., (1971); 2 MCCORMICK ON EVIDENCE § 339, at 421 (5th ed. 1999).
Griffith v. Latiolais 32 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., , (1971); 2 McCormick on EvidenCE § 339, at 421 (5th ed.1999).
Jackson v. Callaghan 24 So. 3d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
DUNOMES v. Plaquemines Parish Government 24 So. 3d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
(ellipses indicate omitted citations) Youn also approvingly referenced the court’s -07 , (1971), wherein the court fixed an award for loss of earnings based on “less-than-perfect evidence.” Youn, 623 So.2d at 1261-62 .
Pugh v. City of Plaquemine 996 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Overton v. Shell Oil Co. 937 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Coutee v. Global Marine Drilling Co. 924 So. 2d 112 La. 2006
Jenny Slayton v. John N. Davis D/B/A Hub City Motors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Slayton v. Davis 901 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Driscoll v. Stucker 893 So. 2d 32 La. 2005
Co., , (1971); Bruce v. State Farm Ins.
Soares v. Tidewater, Inc. 895 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Co., , 245 * (1971); McCormick on Evidence § 339, at 421 (5th ed.1999).
John Nathan Thibeaux v. Chuck R. Trotter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., So.2d 151 (1971); Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 252 La.
Thibeaux v. Trotter 883 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., , (1971); Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 252 La.
Riley v. Salley 874 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
(1971); See Prosser, Torts, § 41, p. 269 (5th ed.1984); 2 McCormick, Evidence, § 339 (4th ed.1992); 9 Wigmore, Evidence, §§ 2497, 2498 (3d ed.1940).
State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Office of Family Support ex rel. Perdue v. Langlois 874 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
STATE EX REL. DEP. OF SOC. SER. v. Langlois 874 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Driscoll v. Stucker 865 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Co., , , (La.1971); Bruce v. State Farm Ins.
Talbot v. Talbot 864 So. 2d 590 La. 2003
Co., , (1971); McCormick on Evidence § 339, at 421 (5th ed.1999).
Sepulvado v. Turner 862 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Bruce A. Baker v. Mazda Motor of America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Technisonic Research, Inc. v. Technical Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., So.2d 151 (La.1971).
Baker v. Mazda Motor of America 856 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Technisonic Research, Inc. v. Technical Industries, Inc. 856 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Chastant v. Oasys Imaging, Inc. 839 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
155: * * * proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.’ The appellant’s first assignment of error relates to the trial court’s finding
Wood v. Becnel 840 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
(1971), the Supreme Court stated that “proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance, when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.” 257 La.
Elsensohn v. Farrington Productions, Inc. 840 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Co., , (1971); Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 252 La.
Wyatt v. Avoyelles Parish School Bd. 831 So. 2d 906 La. 2002
Co., , (1971); Madison v. American Sugar Refining Co., 243 La.
Rosen v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 809 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002