Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., 256 So. 2d 105.

154 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Sidney Myers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., –31, (1971) (footnotes omitted).
Ebony Holmes v. City of New Orleans, Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, Hard Rock Construction, LLC, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
the avoidance of indefinite relitigation of the same issue; [ii] the desirability of 3 consistency of the result in the same litigation; and [iii] the efficiency, and the essential fairness to both parties, of affording a single opportunity for the argument and decision of the matter at issue.” Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., 256 So.
Deanna Smith v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Day v. Campbell–Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105, 107 (1971).
State of Louisiana v. Freeman Eric Tucker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
The present case provides another illustration of the need for the use of the doctrine in some form.” We further note this court’s decision in Dugas is supported by the supreme court’s statement in Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., –31, (1971), “Nevertheless, the law-of- the-case principle is applied merely as a discretionary guide: Argument is barred where there is merely doubt as to the correctness of the former ruling, but not in cases of palpable former error or so mechan
Spartan Directional, L.L.C. v. Energy Services South, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Day v. Campbell–Grosjean Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105 (1971).
State of Louisiana v. Robert H. Miller, III A/K/A Robert Miller, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Kayla M. Neville Versus John W. Redmann, Law Office of John W. Redmann, LLC, and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
1973); Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & S. M. Corp., So.2d 105 (1971); Bonar v. Bonar, 00-232 (La.
James Middleton Huger v. Stephanie Goliwas Huger La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
licy reasons behind this doctrine, including: “(1) avoiding relitigation of the same issue; (2) promoting consistency of result in the same action; and (3) promoting efficiency and fairness to the parties by affording a single opportunity for the argument and decision of the matter at issue.” Id., 11-0751, pp. 6-7, 90 So.3d at 526 (citing Day v. Campbell–Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105, 107 (1971)).
Ashley Nichole Major Bares and James Wesley Major v. Progressive Gulf Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Day v. Campbell- Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Dangelo Dugas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. John James Edmond, Jr. A/K/A Johnny James Edmond, Jr. A/K/A John Edmond, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
2/26/16), see Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., (1971).
Opelousas General Hospital Authority, a Public Trust v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company D/B/A Blue cross/blue Shield … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Day v. Campbell–Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105 (1971).
Neighbors of 200 Henry Clay Avenue and Audubon Riverside Neighborhood Association v. the Board of Zoning Adjustment of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Day v. Campbell–Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., (1971).
Pat Cooper v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Day v. Campbell– Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105 (1971).
Matthew Lacas v. Monroe Credit, LLC, Willys Gerald, Patrick Herring, and Richard W. Huye, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.
George Raymond Williams, M.D. Orthopaedic Surgery v. Bestcomp, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
This policy applies only against those who were parties to the case when the former appellate decision was rendered and who thus had their day in court.” Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., (1971) (footnotes omitted).
State Of Louisiana, Et Al. v. Louisiana Land & La. 2021
2d 81, 83 (1973); Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., (1971).
Eugene R. Guilbeaux v. Lupo Enterprises, L.L.C. and United Fire & Casualty Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
(quoting Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal 16 Corp., (La.
Elizabeth Sewell, Wife of/and William Sewell, Elsebeth Fenner, Wife of/and James Fenner, and Beth Duessing, Wife of/and George … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., (La.
Federal Work Ready, Inc. v. Barry Wright and Millicent Wright La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Day v. Campbell—Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., (1971).
State of Louisiana v. DAVID BOURG La. 2019
See Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., (1971).
Mary Ortega v. Cantu Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Day v. Campbell–Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105 (1971).
Fluid Disposal Specialties, Inc. v. UniFirst Corporation La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.
State v. Johnson 266 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Chandler 240 So. 3d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
2/26/16), ; see Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp. , , 330, , 107 (1971).
Hansen v. River Cities Disposal Co. 245 So. 3d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
RCDC cites a passage from this court's opinion ("Such a determination [the intent of the parties] can not be made on affidavits but can only be determined after trial") and argues that this constitutes law of the case, Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp. , , (1971).
Gabriel v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 222 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
at 1207 (quoting Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (La.
Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co. 219 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).
Kodie J. Courville, Et Ux. v. Allstate Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105, 107 (1971) (footnotes omitted).
Courville v. Allstate Insurance Co. 215 So. 3d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971) (footnotes omitted).
Louque v. Scott Equipment Co. 212 So. 3d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).
Southern Trace Property Owners Ass'n v. Williams 210 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971); J-W Operating Co. v. Olsen, 49,925 (La.App.
Brandi Billeaudeau, Veronica Billeaudeau, and Joseph Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority, Dr. Kondilo Skirlis-Zavala, and the Shumacher … 218 So. 3d 513 La. 2016
As learned jurist, Albert A. Tate, Jr., explained when organ for the Court in Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971): With regard to an appellate court, the 'law of the case’ refers to a policy by which the court will not, on a subsequent appeal, reconsider prior rulings in the same case.
Rountree v. Forsythe Holdings, Inc. 196 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).
Correro v. Ferrer 188 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).
Kevin W. Jones, Sr. v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Day v. Campbell- Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., So.2d 105 (1971).
Jones v. Town of Woodworth 178 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
J-W Operating Co. v. Olsen 167 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).
State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. Division of Administration, Office of Risk Management v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Louisiana 146 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).
State v. Adams 125 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Rain CII Carbon LLC v. ConocoPhillips Co. 105 So. 3d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Hill 94 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Patin 95 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Myers v. National Union Fire Ins. 90 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
The Louisiana Supreme Court has cited the policy reasons behind this doctrine as being “(1) avoiding relitigation of the same issue; (2) promoting consistency of result in the same action; and (3) promoting efficiency and fairness to the parties by affording a single opportunity for the argument and decision of the 17matter at issue.” Day v. Campbel-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corporation, , (1971).
Keyclick Outsourcing, Inc. v. Ochsner Health Plan, Inc. 89 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).
State v. Cox 85 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Molineux 76 So. 3d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Pollard v. Alpha Technical 102 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Day v. Campbell-Grosjean Roofing & Sheet Metal Corp., , (1971).