Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prieur, 277 So. 2d 126.
- State v. Broussard 649 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. Nedd 647 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- State v. Free 643 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- State v. Davis 637 So. 2d 1012 La. 1994
-
State v. Lee
637 So. 2d 656
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
when the state intends to offer evidence of other criminal offenses: (1) The State shall within a reasonable time before trial furnish in writing to the defendant a statement of the acts or offenses it intends to offer, describing same with the general particularity required of an indictment or information.
-
State v. Jamison
640 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when the State intends to offer evidence of other criminal offenses, the State must give notice in writing of the acts or offenses it intends to offer.
- State v. Soler 636 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
- State v. Johnson 631 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
State v. DeRoche
629 So. 2d 1267
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
[1] The introduction into evidence of a defendant's other crimes, wrongs, and its progeny.
- State v. Dixon 628 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Outley 629 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- State v. Gerard 627 So. 2d 174 La. 1993
- State v. Code 627 So. 2d 1373 La. 1993
-
State v. Gaines
633 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Defendant maintains that, if the two charges had been billed separately, evidence of one offense would have been inadmissible other crimes evidence () in the trial of the other offense.
-
State v. Rice
626 So. 2d 515
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
art 404, which deals with Prieur notice [ ].
-
State v. Evins
626 So. 2d 480
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Defendant's basic contention is that the trial court improperly allowed evidence of other crimes into evidence without first allowing the defendant a
-
State v. Jackson
625 So. 2d 146
La. 1993
The state filed a Notice of Intent to Use Evidence of Other Bad Acts to Show "Knowledge, System & Intent"
-
State v. Parker
625 So. 2d 1364
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In order for the evidence of these two prior burglaries to be admissible, (La.
-
State v. Smith
625 So. 2d 620
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2 Defendant asserts the trial court erred in allowing the state’s witness to disclose- “other crimes”
- State v. Duke 625 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- State v. Carr 620 So. 2d 1325 La. 1993
- State v. Carr 620 So. 2d 1325 La. 1993
- State v. Bourque 622 So. 2d 198 La. 1993
- State v. Tolliver 621 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
State v. Tyler
619 So. 2d 807
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
[2] In addition to these requirements
-
State v. Carr
620 So. 2d 288
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Second, defendant asserts that, (La.
-
State v. Griffin
618 So. 2d 680
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
This article neither codifies nor affects the law of other crimes evidence, and their progeny.
-
State v. Wisinger
618 So. 2d 923
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
In the event that the state desires to introduce other crimes evidence to establish "motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake or accident," (La.
- State v. Jamison 617 So. 2d 480 La. 1993
- State v. Colbert 615 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
State v. Welch
615 So. 2d 300
La. 1993
15:445-446, it was "not intended to change the law" and its progeny.
-
State v. Bonck
613 So. 2d 1125
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
PRIEUR INCIDENT/SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE In the case before us the State, cert.
-
State v. Hutson
613 So. 2d 1134
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
In this assignment of error, Hutson contends that this testimony by Wilson constituted evidence of other crimes and that a
- State v. Silguero 608 So. 2d 627 La. 1992
-
State v. Jackson
608 So. 2d 949
La. 1992
(at the defendant's trial for armed robbery, evidence of a subsequent armed robbery is only admissible if adequate notice is provided by the prosecutor); (failure to notify the defendant that evidence of an unrelated armed robbery for which the defendant had been ch
-
State v. Plater
606 So. 2d 824
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
404(B)(1), 403; (on rehearing).
-
State v. Smith
601 So. 2d 361
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
The defense also noted for the record that the state had failed to provide the defendant with written notice of its intent to introduce other crimes *363 evidence, see also LSA-C.E.
- State v. Tucker 602 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
State v. Fink
601 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
*697 Prior to trial the State filed a Motion of Intent to Use Evidence of Other Crimes pursuant to Article 720 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure; (1973) (1979), the purpose stated in the notice of using evidence of other crimes being to show defendant's knowledge, intent, guilty knowledge, system and motive.
- State v. Hanks 593 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- State v. Granier 592 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
-
State v. Gibson
591 So. 2d 416
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
By defendant’s first and second assignments of error, he contends that the trial court erred in permitting the State to cross-examine him regarding a
- State v. Lewis 590 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
State v. Mayer
589 So. 2d 1145
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
the State filed pre-trial notice of its intent to use evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts committed by defendant.
-
State v. Long
590 So. 2d 694
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Even though defendant fails to specify which other crimes evidence prejudiced him, prior to trial on the issue of the admissibility of other crimes evidence, and this issue was hotly contested in the trial court.
- State v. Brewington 587 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- State v. Velez 588 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
-
State v. Gene
587 So. 2d 18
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Art. 404B(1) and related comments
- State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Willis 577 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991