Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haskins v. Clary, 346 So. 2d 193.

147 citing documents.

Brandy Harry v. ABC Insurance Company, XYZ Insurance Company, Shell Chemical LP La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2025
Pineville City Court v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Ramos v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co. 262 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Haskins v. Clary , , 194 (La.
Vince ex rel. Southland Express, LLC v. Metro Rediscount Co. 259 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Era Helicopters, LLC v. Daniel Amegin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
In such cases, the exception of no cause of action must be overruled “unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based.”
ERA Helicopters, LLC v. Amegin 181 So. 3d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In such cases, the exception of no *243 cause of action must be overruled “unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based.”
Heather Miley Cloud v. Tom Schedler in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State for the State of … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Cloud v. Schedler 161 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Anderson v. Bossier Parish Police Jury 153 So. 3d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
When an exception of no cause of action is based on an affirmative defense, the exception must be overruled “unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based.”
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance v. Pacorini Metals, USA, L.L.C. 131 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[A]n exception of no cause of action must be overruled unless the allegations of the petition exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than the premise upon which the defense is based; that is, unless plaintiff has no cause of action under any evidence admissible under the pleadings.”
Harney v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Co. 106 So. 3d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 865; Quinn, 12-0152 at 11, n. 6, - So.3d-, n. 6; (La.
LOBELL v. Rosenberg 62 So. 3d 823 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 865; Teachers’ Retirement System v. Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System, *829 Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., ).
Susan Elizabeth Jackson Piccione v. Richard James Piccione La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Piccione v. Piccione 20 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Rachelle Starrett Preuett v. Ira Anderson Preuett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Preuett v. Preuett 4 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
art. 927; Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Doe v. Smith 913 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
in which the Court held that the exception of no cause of action is available only to those affirmative defenses that are disclosed on the face of the petition.
Cox v. Boggs 899 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Wells v. Standard Mortgage Corp. 865 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Owens v. Book 819 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Fink v. Bryant 801 So. 2d 346 La. 2001
Lann v. Davis 793 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Williams v. State 786 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Farmco Inc. v. West Baton Rouge Parish Governing Council 808 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Brown 756 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Steed v. ST. PAUL'S UNITED METH. CHURCH 728 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Simmons v. Templeton 723 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Nelson v. Williams 707 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Jenkins v. Waste Management of Louisiana, Inc. 709 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Kelly v. CNA Ins. Co. 706 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Berry v. Insurance Co. of North America 683 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Succession of Fragala 680 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Perry v. First National Bank of Jefferson 673 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. England, 252 La.
Edelman v. New Orleans Saints 656 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
While the exception of no cause of action tests the sufficiency of the pleadings, the motion for summary judgment determines whether a genuine issue of material fact exists.
Hill ex rel. Hill v. Joseph 655 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
*91 Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
City of New Orleans v. Board of Com'rs 640 So. 2d 237 La. 1994
927, 931; Darville v. Texaco, Inc.
Roberts v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 634 So. 2d 341 La. 1994
Art. 927; Darville v. Texaco, Inc. Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.
Townsend v. PPG Industries, Inc. 628 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
*1207 (La.1984); Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Kleiser v. Kleiser 619 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bespress, Inc. v. Capital Bank of Delhi 616 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Art. 931; Darville v. Texaco, Inc., Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Leenerts Farms
Glynn v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 597 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Williams v. Hattan 594 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Massey v. G.B. Cooley Hospital for Retarded Citizens 593 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Teachers Retirement System of Louisiana v. Louisiana State Employees’ Retirement System, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
Kyle v. Civil Service Com'n 588 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
McLean v. Smith 593 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Sweeney, Inc. v. Olivier 589 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
and cases cited therein.
Teche Planting, Inc. v. Teche Sugar Co. 583 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
This prohibition limits the use of an exception of no cause of action “as a vehicle for affirmative defenses to those which are disclosed by the petition itself.”
Fibrebond Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 583 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Dufour v. US Home Corp. 581 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991