Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

State v. Fernandez 50 So. 3d 219 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Ferguson 43 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Jenkins 45 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Daniel L. Pegues La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Const. art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State v. Pegues 43 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State of Louisiana v. Bianca Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Turner 38 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Johnson 41 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Const, art. I, § 20, which prohibits “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State of Louisiana v. Darrell James Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. JSW 37 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. J.S. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Charles Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. J.S.W. 37 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. David Paul Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State v. Guidry 30 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. CASSIMERE 34 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State v. Collins 35 So. 3d 1103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hyman 33 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Tate 33 So. 3d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Conner 30 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Laster 33 So. 3d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Allen 30 So. 3d 1024 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Joseph T. Plauche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Plauche 32 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State v. Lofton 25 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Victorian 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Malcolm James Simon AKA Malcolm Simon AKA Malcolm J. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
However, in State v. Marshall, 94-0461, p. 24 (La.9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State of Louisiana v. Wayne Patterson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Patterson 22 So. 3d 261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
"`[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State v. ZANTIZ 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Prejean 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bordelon 33 So. 3d 842 La. 2009
a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.”
State v. Domingue 18 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Terry Julius Domingue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Roy J. Chapman, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
9/5/95), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that “[a] sentence may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment even if it is within the statutory limit,”
State of Louisiana v. Broadus Darneal Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Davis 19 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Dupas 17 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Moss 17 So. 3d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bell 16 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Calloway 15 So. 3d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lewis 16 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Smith, 01-2574, p. 6 (La.1/14/03)
State v. Vidrine 5 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
"' [T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.'" ().
State of Louisiana v. Raymundo Franco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State of Louisiana v. Patrick Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State of Louisiana v. Felicia Ann Luno La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
State of Louisiana v. Casey Vidrine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
“‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().