Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

State v. Wilson 99 So. 3d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.” State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ().
State v. Boudreaux 98 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Lester J. Celestine AKA Lester G. Celestine, Sr. AKA Lester G. Celestine La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. J.A. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Underdonk 92 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Dauzart 89 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Colvin 85 So. 3d 663 La. 2012
Const, art. I, § 20, ie., when it imposes ‘punishment disproportionate to the offense.’ ” State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ().
State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. John D. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
“ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” [ ( ]).
State of Louisiana v. John D. Skinner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Skinner 84 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“ ‘[T]he exeessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” [ ( ]).
State v. Skinner 84 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Robinson 81 So. 3d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Knight 77 So. 3d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Martin 72 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State ex rel. J.A. 73 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State Ex Rel. Ja 73 So. 3d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State of Louisiana v. Travis Bourda La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Johnson, supra at 676
State v. BOURDA 70 So. 3d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Johnson, supra at 676
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Manuel Polanco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Polanco 66 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Carol Wayne Crooks, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Johnson, supra at 676
State v. Colvin 65 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Kimble 62 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Lanieu, 98- *788 1260, p. 12 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Margaret Ann Howard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. J.P. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. J.P.F. 58 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Stanfield 56 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jay Clark La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Dewayne Cyriak La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Giles McGhee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. David G. Sarpy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. CYRIAK 52 So. 3d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. McGhee 52 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Sarpy 52 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Clark 52 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth K. Prejean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
4 discretion to impose sentences gradated according to the individualized circumstances of the offense and of the offender.”
State v. Prejean 50 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“In providing a wide range of criminal sanctions for violations of a statute, the legislature obviously intends that the [trial court] shall exercise [its] sentencing | Bdiscretion to impose sentences gradated according to the individualized circumstances of the offense and of the offender.”
State of Louisiana v. Deanna Gaspard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Gaspard 49 So. 3d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Steven Mark Marc" Anderson " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Johnson, supra at 676
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Paul Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Kevin T. Arndt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
State v. Jacobs 48 So. 3d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Anderson 48 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Johnson, supra at 676