DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Gus Jerrod Melbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    ― ‗[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‘ ‖ ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Jammicka Greene La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “„[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Vincent La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Gus Jerrod Melbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    ― ‗[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‘ ‖ ().
  • State v. Greene 126 So. 3d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Sholar 136 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Dana Bowles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Corey Joseph Craig La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Dennis Weldon Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State v. Thompson 123 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Bowles 123 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Craig 123 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Pernell 127 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    We thus conclude that the trial judge shall, on remand, reconsider the imposition of the life sentence at hard labor without the benefit of parole, probation, (La.
  • State v. Hamdalla 126 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hollins 123 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Const, art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.”
  • State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Jerald C. Fowler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “„[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟” ().
  • State v. Fowler 114 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’” ().
  • State v. Chaplain 114 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Const, art. 1, § 20, i.e., when it imposes “punishment disproportionate to the offense.” State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ().
  • State v. Marcelin 116 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Jamario Kato La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    8 “In providing a wide range of criminal sanctions for violations of a statute, the legislature obviously intends that the [trial court] shall exercise [its] sentencing discretion to impose sentences gradated according to the individualized circumstances of the offense and of the offender.”
  • State v. Kato 157 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    |9“In providing a wide range of criminal sanctions for violations of a statute, the legislature obviously intends that the [trial court] shall exercise [its] sentencing discretion to impose sentences gradated according to the individualized circumstances of the offense and of the offender.”
  • State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Slattery 116 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Johnny L. Eubanks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” [ ( ] ).
  • State v. Eubanks 112 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” [ (]).
  • State of Louisiana v. Ernest Joseph Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Arceneaux 111 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Parker 112 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Const. art. I, § 20, i.e., when it imposes ‘punishment disproportionate to the offense.’ ” State v. Soraparu, 97-1027 (La.10/13/97), ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Willis J. Mouton AKA Willis James Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Mouton 129 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Wayne Kevin Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    State v. Johnson, supra at 676
  • State v. Jones 107 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    State v. Johnson, supra at 676
  • State v. Smith 108 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Sims 106 So. 3d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    provide guidance as to whether the sentence should be closer to the maximum rather than to the minimum statutory range of sentence.” -768 (La.1979).
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA - Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Frank Allen Fregia, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA- Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Emmanuel Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Fregia 105 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State v. Barnes 103 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    “ ‘[T]he exces-siveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.’ ” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky W. Coleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Brenda Gail Rains La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Coleman 101 So. 3d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Rains 101 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Reado 110 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Those cases, and State v. Walker, 29,-877 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/29/97), , involved youthful defendants with no criminal records or any previous tendency toward violence.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles L. Bergeron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “ „[T]he excessiveness of a sentence becomes a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.‟ ” ().
  • State v. Lilly 111 So. 3d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012