Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haughton Elevator Division v. STATE, ETC., 367 So. 2d 1161.

99 citing documents.

The Guide Company, LLC v. Madison Parish District d/b/a Madison Parish Hospital La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Through Div. of Admin., (La.
Lamar Contractors, LLC Versus Srf Group Consulting, LLC La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Lathan Construction, LLC v. Webster Parish School Board an Incorporated Body Through Johnnye Kennon, in Her Official Capacity … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Through Div. of Admin., (La.
Merrick, L.L.C. v. the Airport Authority for Airport Dist. 1, Calcasieu Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
This litigation is governed by Louisiana Public Bid Law, La.R.S.38:2212, et seq., a law which “was enacted in the interest of the taxpaying citizens and has for its purpose their protection against contracts of public officials entered into because of favoritism and involving exorbitant and extortionate prices.”
LeBlanc Marine, L.L.C. v. State of Louisiana, Division of Administration, Office of Facility Planning and Control La. 2019
Contr., Inc., 586 So.2d at 1359
J. Caldarera & Co., Inc. v. Ernest N. Morial Exhibition Hall Authority and Melvin Rodrigue in His Official … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration, (La.
Construction Diva, L.L.C. v. New Orleans Aviation Board 206 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 9/28/11), , citing Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Div. of Admin., (La.
Two Canal Street Investors, Inc. v. New Orleans Building Corp. 193 So. 3d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
through Div. of Admin., ).
Durr Heavy Construction, LLC v. City of New Orleans 217 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Id., Concrete Busters of Louisiana, Inc. v. Board of Comm’rs of the Port of New Orleans, 10-1172, p. 4 (La.App.
Dynamic Constructors, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government 173 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Concrete Busters of Louisiana, Inc. v. Board of Com’rs of the Port of New Orleans, 10-1172, p. 4 (La.App.
Kasha Lapointe v. Vermilion Parish School Board 173 So. 3d 1152 La. 2015
Lange, 56 So.3d at 931 (citing Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Through Div. of Administration, ).
City of Eunice v. Eunice Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Through Div. of Admin.
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. State ex rel. Coastal Protection & Restoration Authority 167 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Courts will not substitute their judgment for the good-faith judgment of an administrative agency.” Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration, (emphasis added).
Data Management Corp. v. Parish of St. John the Baptist 88 So. 3d 557 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/23/10) , , writ denied, 10-2831 (La.2/11/11), , citing Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration
Lemoine/Brasfield & Gorrie Joint Venture, LLC v. Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's Office 63 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
38:2212, et seq., “was enacted in the interest of the taxpaying citizens and has for its purpose their protection against contracts of public officials entered into because of favoritism and involving exorbitant and extortionate prices.”
Concrete Busters of Louisiana, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners 69 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
38:2211, et seq., a law which “was enacted in- the interest of the taxpaying citizens and has for its purpose their protection against contracts of public officials entered into because of favoritism and involving exorbitant and extortionate prices.” Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Div. of Admin.
The Lemoine Company, LLC v. Lafayette Airport Commission La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2 its purpose their protection against contracts of public officials entered into because of favoritism and involving exorbitant and extortionate prices.”
Lemoine Co. v. Lafayette Airport Commission 54 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
38:2212, et seq., a law which “was enacted in the interest of the taxpaying citizens and has for | aits purpose their protection against contracts of public officials entered into because of favoritism and involving exorbitant and extortionate prices.”
Hamp's Construction, L.L.C. v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 52 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
As the Louisiana Supreme Court stated in Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration, “the requirements of procedural due process apply to the deprivation of interests encompassed by the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of liberty and property.
Lange v. Orleans Levee District 56 So. 3d 925 La. 2010
Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, Through Div. of Admin.
A.M.E. Disaster Recovery Services, Inc. v. St. John the Baptist Parish School Board 54 So. 3d 719 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration., J.W.
Fleetcor Technologies Operating Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 30 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration
HISTORIC RESTORATION v. RSUI Indem. Co. 955 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
5 *212 Cir. 6/1/99), ; Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, Ridge Park v. Police Jury of Jefferson Parish, 210 La.
REPUBLIC FIRE AND CAS. v. State 952 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
*97 1990); Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration, Government Computer Sales, Inc. v. State, Through Division of Administration, 98-0224, p. 7 (La.App.
Republic Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. State Divison of Administration, Office of State Purchasing 952 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
*97 1990); Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration, Government Computer Sales, Inc. v. State, Through Division of Administration, 980224, p. 7 (La.App.
Vartech Systems, Inc. v. Hayden 951 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Haughton Elevator Div. v. State, through the Div. of Admin., , 1169 n. 6 (La.1979).
Levine v. First Nat. Bank of Commerce 948 So. 2d 1051 La. 2006
art. 3601; Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, see also, (A preliminary injunction is only provisional and is not intended as a resolution of the merits of a controverted issue.)
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Wells 930 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
See Smith v. West Virginia Oil & Gas Co., Equitable Petroleum v. Central Transmission, Inc., (La.App.
J.S. Rugg Construction, Inc. v. Ouachita Parish School Board 895 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration
Don M. Barron Contractor, Inc. v. City of Natchitoches, Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
the supreme court instructed that when awarding a public works contract, the public agency is vested with the power and discretion to determine the responsibility of the bidder and to reject all bids if none is satisfactory.
G.D. Womack Trenching, Inc. v. Maitland Water System, Inc. 870 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
In Haughton Elevator Division v. State, through the Division of Administration, the supreme court determined that although Haughton was the low bidder on the contract at issue, the contract had been awarded to the second lowest bidder.
G. D. Womack Trenching, Inc. v. Maitland Water System, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
In Haughton Elevator Division v. State, through the Division of Administration, the supreme court determined that although Haughton was the low bidder on the contract at issue, the contract had been awarded to the second lowest bidder.
Broadmoor, LLC v. ERNEST N. MORIAL EXHIBITION 867 So. 2d 651 La. 2004
Contr., Inc., 586 So.2d at 1359
Tiger Air & Heat v. Jefferson Parish School 832 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc., Wallace Stevens, Inc. v. Lafourche Parish Hospital District No. 3, (La.
Mickey O'Connor General Contractor, Inc. v. City of Westwego 804 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Starlight Homes, Inc. v. Jefferson Parish Council, 93-746 (La.App.
State MacHinery and Equipment Sales, Inc. v. Livingston Parish Gravity Drainage District 5 818 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Earlier, the supreme court explained: "[t]he statute vests in the awarding authority the power and discretion to determine the responsibility of the bidder and to reject all bids if none is satisfactory, but the law does not permit the arbitrary selection of one which is higher and the rejection of others which are
EXECUTONE OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA INC. v. Hospital Serv. Dist. No. 1 798 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
See Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, (La.
Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. SEWERAGE & WATER 753 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Airline Construction Co.
State MacH. Sales v. Gravity Drainage 5 742 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Earlier, the supreme court explained: "[t]he statute vests in the awarding authority the power and discretion to determine the responsibility of the bidder and to reject all bids if none is satisfactory, but the law does not permit the arbitrary selection of one which is higher and the rejection of others which are
B.F. Carvin Construction Co. v. Jefferson Parish Council 735 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
5 Cir. 2/14/96) , 1308-1309: In Haughton Elevator Division v. State, etc., the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that the lowest responsive bidder has a protected interest, that of receiving the advertised contract, which cannot be derived without procedural due process.
MERRITT McDONALD v. PARISH OF EAST BATON 742 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
See Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, Boh Brothers, 97-0168 at 5, 698 So.2d at 677 .
GOVERNMENT COMPUTER SALES v. State 720 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Through Division of Administration
Martin v. Kroger Co. 702 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. McInnis Bros. Const. 701 So. 2d 937 La. 1997
JW Rombach, Inc. v. Parish of Jefferson 670 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
In Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc., the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized that the lowest responsive bidder has a protected interest, that of receiving the advertised contract, which cannot be derived without procedural due process.
STATE EX REL. LA. STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF PSYCHOLOGISTS v. Atterberry 664 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See also Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Division of Administration, -69 (La.1979).
New Orleans Rosenbush Claims Service, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 653 So. 2d 538 La. 1995
Farm Credit Bank of Texas v. Sturgeon 640 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Kleiser, Inc. v. Airport Commission of Airport District No. 1 of Jefferson Davis Parish 640 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Haughton Elevator Division v. State, Etc., (La.
SYSTEMS PLUS v. East Jefferson Gen. Hosp. 638 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994