Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Steele, 387 So. 2d 1175.

195 citing documents.

State v. Martin 92 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Terry L. Cooley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
In State v. Steele, supra, [] the defendant was originally charged with three offenses, including reckless driving, DWI, and negligent injuring.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Cooley 87 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In State v. Steele, supra, [ ] the defendant was origi *297 nally charged with three offenses, including reckless driving, DWI, and negligent injuring.
State v. Anderson 91 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only | iaone.
State v. Hall 85 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ERIC DARELL COSEY AKA HENRY CARTER AKA KENDRICK CARTER La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
(citation omitted): If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State of Louisiana v. Chad E. Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, an
State v. Drake 71 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Patton 68 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Marcus W. Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Cotton, 00-850, p. 5 (La.1/29/01)
State v. Anderson 66 So. 3d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Cotton, 00-850, p. 5 (La.1/29/01)
State v. Spikes 66 So. 3d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Garcia 66 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Alex P. Papillion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
The test depends on the evidence necessary for a conviction, not all of the evidence introduced at trial.” See also Coody, Vaughn
State v. Papillion 63 So. 3d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The test depends on the evidence necessary for a conviction, not all of the evidence introduced at trial.” See also Coody, ; Vaughn, ; .
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
306 (1932) test and the “same evidence test.”
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jason Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Cotton, 00-850, p. 5 (La.1/29/01)
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Miller 49 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
*1034 State v. Cotton, 00-850, p. 5 (La.1/29/01)
State of Louisiana v. Chrishon M. Archield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Kendall Paul Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double
State v. ARCHIELD 34 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Cotton, 00-850, p. 5 (La.1/29/01)
State v. Davis 36 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double 11fljeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State of Louisiana v. Richard W. Black La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a
State v. Black 33 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State v. Ashley 22 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Redfearn 22 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Clark 16 So. 3d 1256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Thornton Gross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Gross 16 So. 3d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Manning 15 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Sims 7 So. 3d 1288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Alexander 2 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double j
State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a
State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State of Louisiana v. Eulicee Jamar Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, an
State v. Powell 968 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Kelley, supra .
State v. Williams 952 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. Tommy Cloud La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense
State v. Cloud 946 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that test as follows: If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one.
State of Louisiana v. Donald O'Conner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
La.1980); State v. Didier, 262 La.
State v. O'Connor 944 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Didier, 262 La.
State v. Williams 924 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State of Louisiana v. Larry James Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
CONST. art. 1, § 15, Louisiana courts have used the “same evidence” test, which we have remarked is “somewhat broader in concept than Blockburger.” (1980).
State of Louisiana v. Donald Cogswell, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Didier, 262 La.