Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Freeman, 427 So. 2d 1161.

68 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Emmanuel Dewayne Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. James A. Blake La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Markell Woods La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Terrence Keith Wilson La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
Our Supreme Court has noted that “[i]n a non-homicide situation, the defense of self-defense requires a dual inquiry; an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary.” (La.
Alphonso B. Williams v. Christopher L. Hart & ABC Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Daniel E. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Christian A. Satterfield La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Joshua Neames La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Erin Serigny La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Wayne Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Ross 269 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
In State v. Freeman , (La.
State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Freeman , , 1163 (La.
State v. Mollerberg 260 So. 3d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In State v. Freeman , , 1162-63 (La.
State v. Barron 243 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
In State v. Freeman , (La.
State v. De Gruy 215 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Jones 152 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Updite, 38,423 (La.App.2d Cir.6/23/04), , writ denied, 2004-1866 (La.11/24/04), .
State ex rel. A.W. 137 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jefferson, 2004-1960, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
*866 Lemmon, J., concurring.
State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Barnes 100 So. 3d 926 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Nailor, 10-1062, p. 8, (La.App.
State v. Nailor 78 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Boudreaux 48 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Jefferson, 2004-1960, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
State v. Black 41 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir.1993): “In a non-homicide situation, the defense of justification requires a dual inquiry, namely: an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; and, a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary.” (La.App.
State v. Lowe 994 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Ford 976 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Updite, 38,223, 38,423 (La.App.
State v. Tyner 953 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Updite, 38,423 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Dawn R. Hargrave La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Hargrave 926 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Qualls 921 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Updite, 38,423 (La.App.2d Cir.6/23/04), , writ denied, 04-1866 (La.11/24/04), ; (La.App.
State v. Jefferson 922 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Ginger Roberts Berrigan, Louisiana Criminal Trial Practice § 21-19 (3d ed.1998)
State v. Sanders 900 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Updite, 38,423 (La.App.
State v. Richardson 896 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Updite, 38,423 (La.App.2d Cir.06/23/04), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.11/24/04), .
State v. Hall 889 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
a non-homicide case, the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated that the defendant in a non-homicide case may have the burden of proving self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
State v. Wischer 885 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Chief Justice Calogero acknowledged that there was no Louisiana jurisprudence distinguishing the burdens of persuasion applicable to self-defense in homicide and non-homicide cases.
State v. Updite 877 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Cheatham 877 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
In Mason , wherein the supreme court held: ...
State v. Taylor 874 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated in dicta that the defendant in a non-homicide case may have the burden of proving self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
State v. Brown 868 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Robinson 848 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
State v. Harris 842 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
5 Cir. 11/25/98), , found: [I]n the non-homicide situation, the defense of self-defense requires a dual inquiry; an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary.
State v. Rasheed 841 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
5 Cir.1986), found: [I]n the non-homicide situation, the defense of self-defense requires a dual inquiry; an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary.
State v. Woods 828 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. McClure 793 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Evans 786 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated, in dicta, that the defendant in a non-homicide case may have the burden of proving self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
State v. Thomas 734 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that "in the non-homicide situation, the defense of self-defense requires a dual inquiry; an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary."
State v. Rainey 722 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
the Louisiana Supreme Court indicated, in dicta, that the defendant in a nonhomicide case may have the burden of proving self-defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
State v. Richardson 648 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
State v. Fluker 618 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993