Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Carlos Anthony Toby La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Shecorey Young La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana Versus Malcolm J Reed La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Cheri Hayden v. Frederick Boutte, Warden La. 2024
3 It is well-settled that courts view recantations “with utmost suspicion.” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Hurst La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Michael T. Robinson Denzel West Kirk Powell La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Allen Clayton Fulks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Scott La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Gilbert J. Burciaga La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Austin William Bost La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy O'Neal Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Zackery Shane Deville A/K/A Zackery Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Kelby Meaux A/K/A Kelby D. Meaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
art. 851(B)(3), this Court has consistently held that such a ruling is “entitled to great weight, and his discretion should not be disturbed on review if a reasonable man could differ as to the propriety of the trial court’s action.”
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana in the Interest of M.J. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Eddie Hilliard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
In ruling on a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, the trial judge’s “duty is not to weigh the new evidence as though he were a jury determining guilt or innocence, rather his duty is the narrow one of ascertaining whether there is new material fit for a new jury’s judgment.” (La.
State v. Newsome 265 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Prudholm , , 738 (La.1984) ; see also State v. Robinson , 09-0922 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Richard Lindsey Gallier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Parker 259 So. 3d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
art. 851 ; State v. Prudholm , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Mario Jamal Viltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Viltz 261 So. 3d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
E.g. , State v. Prudholm
State v. Molette 258 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Prudholm , , 741 (La.
State v. Hicks 258 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Prudholm , , 741 (La.
State v. Brooks 256 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Prudholm , (La.
State v. Mollerberg 260 So. 3d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See also State v. Prudholm , , 735 (La.
State v. Dufrene 251 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Prudholm , , 736 (La.
State v. Doucette 243 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Prudholm , , 738 (La.1984).
State of Louisiana v. Kentrell D. McElroy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. McElroy 241 So. 3d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977) ; State v. Prudholm , ; State v. Valentine , (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Reokenski Vodise Thomas AKA Reokenski Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1988), writ denied, we refused to reverse the trial court’s decision to admonish a Jury to disregard a police officer’s testimony regarding the alleged bad acts of one co-defendant at the trial of the other rather than grant a mistrial, reasoning as follows: in which case a police officer alluded to other charges against a co-defendant .
State v. Thomas 258 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 1988), writ denied , we refused to reverse the trial court's decision to admonish a jury to disregard a police officer's testimony regarding the alleged bad acts of one co-defendant at the trial of the other rather than grant a mistrial, reasoning as follows: The facts of the instant case closely resemble State v. Prudholm , in which case a police officer alluded to other charges against a co-defendant ...
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Climes Thibeaux AKA Nathaniel Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Thibeaux 229 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Gross 218 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Cody Keith Fontenot -Aka- Cody Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Lloyd Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
20 Finally, “recantations are highly suspicious and, except in rare circumstances, a motion for new trial should not be granted on the basis of a recantation[.]”
State v. Richardson 206 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
| ⅞1 Finally, “recantations are highly suspicious and, except in rare circumstances, a motion for new trial should not be granted on the basis of a reeantation[.]”
State v. Fontenot 207 So. 3d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Merwin 186 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Asa Bentley AKA - Asa N. Bentley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Bentley 182 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
State v. Pollard 165 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Robinson 163 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015