Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Prudholm, 446 So. 2d 729.

589 citing documents.

State v. Armstead 159 So. 3d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Wilson 167 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
182 , 163 L.Ed.2d 187 (2005); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Jaime Brooks Day La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Day 158 So. 3d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Prudholm, *127 (La.App.
State v. Long 154 So. 3d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
the supreme court determined that the victim’s general description at the time of the offense carried little weight considering her state of mind after the crime.
State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State ex rel. A.J. 151 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Briley 151 So. 3d 633 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972); ).
State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Henry 147 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972)
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Wayne Carmouche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Mark 146 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Carmouche 145 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Nora 143 So. 3d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Taylor 143 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Alcide Hypolite La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Hypolite 139 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Norah 131 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972)
State v. Thomas 131 So. 3d 84 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
In ruling on a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, the trial judge’s “duty is not to weigh the new evidence as though he were a jury determining guilt or innocence, rather his duty is the narrow one of ascertaining whether there is new material fit for a new *90 jury’s judgment.”
State ex rel. J.D. 129 So. 3d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Quang T. Do 130 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Angelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Angelle 124 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pierre 125 So. 3d 403 La. 2013
art. 851(8); (“The trial judge’s duty [under art. 851(8) ] is not to weigh the new evidence as though he were a jury determining guilt or innocence, rather his duty is the narrow one of ascertaining whether there is new material fit for a new jury’s judgment.”); see also State v. Cavalier, 96-3052, pp, 3-4 (La.10/31
State v. Keys 125 So. 3d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Ruano 120 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Eric John Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Anderson 116 So. 3d 1045 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Duckett 119 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Coe, 09-1012 (La.App.
State v. Holmes 119 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Coe, 09-1012 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brent Authorlee La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
2243, 2254, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Authorlee 111 So. 3d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2243, 2254 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Krodinger 128 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Gilmore 156 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Holmes, 05 -1248, p. 6 (La.App.
State v. Hayes 108 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
With regard to the issue of suppressing an identification, ―[a] defendant attempting to suppress an identification must prove both that the identification itself was suggestive and that there was a likelihood of misidentification as a result of the identification procedure.‖
State v. Skipper 101 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2243, 2254, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977)
State v. Shannon 101 So. 3d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sparks, 88-0017, p. 52 (La.5/11/11)
State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Charles Paul Celestine AKA Paul Charles Celestine AKA Charles P. Celestine AKA Paul C. … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Celestine 91 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
(officer’s remark allegedly casting the accused as an associate of criminals was not prejudicial and did not impact the fairness of trial).
State v. Cavazos 94 So. 3d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Harris 88 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Foret, 96-281, p. 35 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth G. Billingsley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Billingsley 86 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012