Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Captville, 448 So. 2d 676.

1134 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Roger Barber La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State v. 19-KP-286 3 Captville, (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Walter Rosario-Colon La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Steven Staggs La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Chaddrick Piper La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Robert Ladell La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State Of Louisiana v. Timothy Lee Elliott La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. David Leger La. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brian Michael Hughes La. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Edwin Paul Frinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Finally, “[w]hen a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant’s own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Frinks 274 So. 3d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Captville , , 680 (La.1984.)
State of Louisiana v. Frin Wayne Coward La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Antonio Merquis Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Randall Paul Burton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Harris 274 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Captville , , 678 (La.1984).
State v. Burton 274 So. 3d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Captville , , 680 (La.1984).
State v. Davis 273 So. 3d 670 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Jackson v. Virginia , supra ; State v. Captville , (La.
State v. Young 270 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
05-0213, p. 7, 921 So.2d at 99 ( , 680 (La.
State v. Flores 268 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
10/18/17), , citing State v. Captville , (La.
State v. Quinn 275 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2/21/14), , 1258 ( per curiam ); , 678 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Khoi Q. Hoang La. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jeffery Wayne Ross La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1982) (citation omitted); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
-22 (La.1982) (citation omitted); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1982) (citation omitted); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Katron v. Richard A/K/A Katron Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Ralph Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), ).
State of Louisiana v. Ladray Bias, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Charles P. Mayeux, Jr. AKA Charles P. Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
anded by Jackson, this Court has further subscribed to the general principle in cases involving circumstantial evidence that when the fact finder at trial reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence advanced by the defendant, “that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.”
State v. Bias 265 So. 3d 821 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Captville , ).
State v. Johnson 265 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), and State v. Captville , ).
State v. Katron 265 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Mayeux 265 So. 3d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Gabriel 262 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
4 Cir. 8/7/13), , 1059 ( (La.
State v. Hampton 261 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Captville , (La.
State v. Jackson 265 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Henry 256 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Captville , ).
State of Louisiana v. Kade Starbuck Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State ex rel. D.J.S. 255 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Captville , , 680 (La.
State in the Interest of D.J.S. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Kevin James Alexander -Aka- Kevin J. Alexander -Aka- James K. Alexander -Aka- Kevin Alexander, … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Dirk Douglas Thomas AKA Dirk Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Zachary Alexander Bench La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” 678 (La.1984).
State v. Alexander 256 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Captville , , 678 (La.1984).
State v. Thomas 255 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/22/10), , 378 (quoting State v. Captville , , 680 (La.1984) ).
State v. Bench 256 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Captville , , 678 (La.1984)....
State v. Mollerberg 260 So. 3d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Captville , , 680 (La.
State v. Irvin 259 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Parvez 249 So. 3d 102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
6/29/01), , 657, quoting State v. Captville , , 678 (La.
State v. Pruitt 245 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In State v. Captville , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant's conviction of second degree murder.
State of Louisiana v. Jackie Lynn Pruitt AKA Jackie L. Pruitt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction of 23 second degree murder.