Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Captville, 448 So. 2d 676.

1134 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Marshall J. Alexander, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. David Paul Monceaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
filed September 20, 2006 (No. 06-6799)
State of Louisiana v. Hugh Gilliam La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Quantavious R. Green La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Daniel E. Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
this Court explained that “[w]hen a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant’s own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction, “the appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Elijah Mealancon La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Tristan Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State Of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Trahan A/k/a Elizebeth Trahan La. 2021
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)… [T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most 4 favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Elie, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); ).
State of Louisiana v. Bruce L. Lachney La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Victor Luis Avila Ramos La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Shane Christian Pagano La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Dwight Washington La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Millennium Health Care Services, L.L.C., d/b/a Millennium PCA Services La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Dwaine Joseph Woods, Sr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Walter Perell Fisher, Jr. La. 2021
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. James Bourgeois La. 2021
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Young La. 2021
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lisa W. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
-475 (La.1983); (citing cases); - 1231 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Michael Vaccaro La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
1279 (2007) (citing Jackson, 443 U.S. 307; ).
State of Louisiana v. Trevonte Lamarque Talbert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana Versus Jakorey Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Mitchell, 99-3342, 772 So.2d at 85 ( n.4 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Charles R. Lane La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
12/17/18), (If there is more than one reasonable interpretation of the evidence, the rational view of all the evidence most favorable to the prosecution must be adopted.); Taylor, 166 So.3d at 993 ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Alfred Jones, Jr La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Leo Dorsey La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana in the Interest of D.F.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Steven Dakota Rodgers La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Elizabeth Trahan A/K/A Elizebeth Trahan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Miranda Cheyenne Gilley La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Orlando Demond Morris Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Brian L. Pope La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. William Thomas Jones, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana Versus Emmett Garrison, IV AKA "Lil Emmet" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
ce demanded by Jackson, the Louisiana Supreme Court has further subscribed to the general principle in cases involving circumstantial evidence that when the trier of fact at trial reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence advanced by the defendant, “that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesis which raises a reasonable doubt.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Cherekita Y. Morehead La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Brandon S. Butler La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
A reasonable alternative hypothesis is not one “which could explain the events in an exculpatory fashion,” but one that “is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not ‘have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” (La.
State in the Interest of G. J. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)....[T]he 2 appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana in the Interest of C.R.. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
State Of Louisiana v. Brhian Thomas La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Raven Lamar Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Nicholls Eason La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Babineaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
1982) (citation omitted); (La.
State of Louisiana v. Desmyne Joseph Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Michael Jerome Cochran A/K/A Michael Jerome Cochran, Jr. A/K/A Michael Cochran La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Randy Keith Baldridge, II -Aka- Randy Baldridge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); ” State v. Leger, 05-11, p. 91 (La.
State of Louisiana v. David Javon Arceneaux AKA David Arceneaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
[T]he appellate court must determine that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all of the elements of the crime had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
State of Louisiana v. Roman Joseph Lastrapes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
As such, : When a case involves circumstantial evidence, and the jury reasonably rejects the hypothesis of innocence presented by the defendant’s own testimony, that hypothesis falls, and the defendant is 19 guilty unless there is anothe